From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1755043Ab3JYOQo (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 25 Oct 2013 10:16:44 -0400
Received: from mail-ob0-f173.google.com ([209.85.214.173]:38033 "EHLO
	mail-ob0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1754964Ab3JYOQl (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 25 Oct 2013 10:16:41 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6700479.xPkgXUV5KL@vostro.rjw.lan>
References: <cover.1382104514.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
	<14730355.7hm7UiW5IU@vostro.rjw.lan>
	<CAKohpokJrj_ZbCPUw4ZpfOWgsDvqxLH9j41eQVC7V7Ny4xE8mA@mail.gmail.com>
	<6700479.xPkgXUV5KL@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 19:46:40 +0530
Message-ID: <CAKohpok9J7hFG63NuijaW2n7Y_CMDGamneye9ioW6R-ZJcPmAA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 Resend 00/34] CPUFreq Cleanup Part III
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>,
        Patch Tracking <patches@linaro.org>,
        "cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" <cpufreq@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 25 October 2013 19:42, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> If I need to revert the first patch, then I'll need to revert all of them.
>
> Also, if you do the same change in multiple places it actually is easier
> to handle it pretty much regardless of the angle you look at that from
> if that's done in one patch.  Please do that.

Sent a merged patch to you...