From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756085Ab2ICI7H (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Sep 2012 04:59:07 -0400 Received: from mail-ie0-f174.google.com ([209.85.223.174]:41169 "EHLO mail-ie0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751672Ab2ICI7E (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Sep 2012 04:59:04 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <50439D44.3080100@yahoo.es> Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 14:29:03 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] dw_dmac: max_mem_width limits value for SRC/DST_TR_WID register From: Viresh Kumar To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Hein Tibosch , Andrew Morton , Hans-Christian Egtvedt , Arnd Bergmann , spear-devel , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "ludovic.desroches" , Havard Skinnemoen , Nicolas Ferre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 3 September 2012 14:19, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: >> Which register are you talking about? This configuration is outside of DMAC >> controller and i am not sure if dw DMAC controller can do 128 or 256 >> bit transfers. > SRC_WIDTH & DST_WIDTH in CTLx. The field are 3 bit long. Acceptable > values from 0 to 5. > 2 corresponds to 32 bit transfers. The field is 3 bit long but only allowable values are 0,1,2 & 3... This is what i can check in my copy of dw_dmac manual. 4 and 5 aren't valid values.