From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756341AbaEIIoN (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 May 2014 04:44:13 -0400 Received: from mail-ob0-f173.google.com ([209.85.214.173]:52640 "EHLO mail-ob0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751854AbaEIIoK (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 May 2014 04:44:10 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20140410143857.GA27654@localhost.localdomain> <20140411145333.GC3438@localhost.localdomain> <20140411151825.GX11096@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20140414110245.GG11096@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20140414114744.GI11096@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20140414120600.GJ11096@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20140415093002.GL1877@localhost.localdomain> Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 14:14:10 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Query]: tick-sched: why don't we stop tick when we are running idle task? From: Viresh Kumar To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Lists linaro-kernel Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 23 April 2014 16:42, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 15 April 2014 15:00, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: >> Ok, I'm a bit buzy with a conference right now but I'm going to summarize that >> soonish. Hi Frederic, Please see if you can find some time to close this, that would be very helpful :) Thanks -- viresh