From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759626Ab3BHCu5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Feb 2013 21:50:57 -0500 Received: from mail-ob0-f178.google.com ([209.85.214.178]:57601 "EHLO mail-ob0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759433Ab3BHCuz (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Feb 2013 21:50:55 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2896238.eRV3G7kyl2@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <2896238.eRV3G7kyl2@vostro.rjw.lan> Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 08:20:55 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] CPUFreq Fixes for 3.9 From: Viresh Kumar To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu, artem.savkov@gmail.com, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org, robin.randhawa@arm.com, Steve.Bannister@arm.com, Liviu.Dudau@arm.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 8 February 2013 05:03, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > I should have done that before, sorry about it. > > Can you please rework this series on top of linux-pm.git/pm-cpufreq and > try to avoid introducing new issues this time? Even i want to do that, but when i fetch your repo i don't see all applied patches in this branch.