From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751786Ab3GQFWV (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 17 Jul 2013 01:22:21 -0400
Received: from mail-ob0-f179.google.com ([209.85.214.179]:49618 "EHLO
	mail-ob0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751361Ab3GQFWT (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 17 Jul 2013 01:22:19 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20130716133319.49ed0838@amdc308.digital.local>
References: <1370502472-7249-1-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com>
	<1372927830-2949-1-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com>
	<1372927830-2949-8-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com>
	<CAKohpo=oB_4gGtNn6jvxSCp665pOq6oqeTCCyGzmN_eWqt0Lhg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20130716133319.49ed0838@amdc308.digital.local>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 10:52:18 +0530
Message-ID: <CAKohponeZ15ruJA9__V70u1Ztr4F9aT+zBinMT5Ewyew53rbyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 7/7] Documentation:cpufreq:boost: Update BOOST documentation
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
        Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>,
        "cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" <cpufreq@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
        Jonghwa Lee <jonghwa3.lee@samsung.com>, l.majewski@majess.pl,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@linaro.org>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
        Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
        Myungjoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 16 July 2013 17:03, Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com> wrote:
> As fair as I've understood our previous discussion (at [*]) we have
> agreed about this. We only export boost attribute when it is supported
> by cpufreq_driver. Rafael was very clear about exporting boost
> attribute:
>
> "Simple: Export it only when supported."
>
> [*]: Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] cpufreq: Add boost frequency support in core

I don't want to search in the Archives but I am sure what we decided
earlier.

Rafael Said:
"Simple: Export it only when supported."

AND

"Don't change behavior of acpi-cpufreq driver"

If you see acpi-cpufreq driver carefully, it always creates "boost"
sysfs entry. If its not supported then it creates a read only entry.

So, please preserve that.