From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751758Ab2HaFoP (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Aug 2012 01:44:15 -0400 Received: from mail-ie0-f174.google.com ([209.85.223.174]:36961 "EHLO mail-ie0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751229Ab2HaFoN (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Aug 2012 01:44:13 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5040488E.307@yahoo.es> References: <503F9F72.9020301@yahoo.es> <5040488E.307@yahoo.es> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 11:14:13 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] dw_dmac: repair driver for use with AVR32 (AP7000) From: Viresh Kumar To: Hein Tibosch Cc: "ludovic.desroches" , egtvedt@samfundet.no, spear-devel , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Havard Skinnemoen , Nicolas Ferre , Andrew Morton , Arnd Bergmann Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 31 August 2012 10:45, Hein Tibosch wrote: > On 8/31/2012 12:26 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: >> BTW, Ideally speaking the fix for AVR32 which will enable 32bit mem >> support and enable BIG endian support should have been part of this >> patchset. That code can go through DMA tree as these patches are >> very closely related. Otherwise now you have to wait till these patches >> are included in linux-next, then only you can send AVR32 patches for >> inclusion. >> >> So, maybe you can just add Acked-by from me and Arnd and include >> AVR patches (Only changes related to these two patches) in the same series. >> That will make life easier for you. > > Good idea, I already wondered how these 5 patches can be kept together: > > 1 [PATCH v2 1/2] dw_dmac: make driver endianness configurable > 2 [PATCH v2 2/2] dw_dmac: max_mem_width limits value for SRC/DST_TR_WID register > 3 [PATCH v2] avr32: at32ap700x: set DMA slave properties for MCI dw_dmac > 4 [PATCH v2 1/2] mmc: atmel-mci: DMA can be used with other controller > 5 [PATCH v2 2/2] mmc: atmel-mci: AP700x PDC is not connected to MCI > > Patch 3 will only compile after patch 2 has been applied. > > Patch 4 and 5 will compile but they will only result in a working mci+dma > after patches 1, 2 and 3 have been applied. > > I'm a mere developer, not a MAINTAINER. But sure it would be good to keep > these together as much as possible. It would also be easier for fellow > avr32/mci users who want to upgrade to 3.5.2 without problems. > > So I assume that you want patches 1 to 3, packed as [PATCH v3 3/3] ? > > The atmel-mci patches will be handled by Ludovic Desroches. Perfect !!