From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752282Ab3FXGSY (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jun 2013 02:18:24 -0400 Received: from mail-oa0-f42.google.com ([209.85.219.42]:63835 "EHLO mail-oa0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751155Ab3FXGSX (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jun 2013 02:18:23 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5527616.jZ71Fx7IV6@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <1371716524-19370-1-git-send-email-cw00.choi@samsung.com> <51C3D01F.7040907@samsung.com> <5527616.jZ71Fx7IV6@vostro.rjw.lan> Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 11:48:22 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: stats: Add 'load_table' debugfs file to show accumulated data of CPUs From: Viresh Kumar To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Chanwoo Choi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kyungmin Park , Myungjoo Ham Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 21 June 2013 18:43, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Well, to be honest, I don't like the whole thing. The more changes you need > to make to the common code to support it, the worse. You meant you didn't like this patch completely? Or the idea that I gave? Getting the new frequency would be very useful IMHO. That would give us a relation between old/new freq and load on each cpu at that time. That's why I suggested it.