From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08113C10F14 for ; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 20:49:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF78721841 for ; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 20:49:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="TlfdBVgk" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728947AbfDHUtY (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Apr 2019 16:49:24 -0400 Received: from mail-it1-f194.google.com ([209.85.166.194]:53472 "EHLO mail-it1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726415AbfDHUtX (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Apr 2019 16:49:23 -0400 Received: by mail-it1-f194.google.com with SMTP id y204so1416372itf.3 for ; Mon, 08 Apr 2019 13:49:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=6fikndBnrEebyCh6F08UPUuck03CmAx6aho1AMBz6FQ=; b=TlfdBVgkzmiPhgSfwSEIl4s+l141o6TBSrxcquxlyClSoTSgZ/SkmUq399E5Oy+P/A boS2GKob3pomajHC1HXWO6TFmBBZvn0YfKfpphHhnNpeJWXKdaai+Xtu8Kn6UGBrn9Jn mRDxFwx43CFdwXNxfxi25TyAyspA9YwUNUnixbZkPO2czLOMwKPXjlhzrxPtODzH1HbL wy/Q357q4eCNk8YxBG77PWX8TpwwSTU0It0bo2munnIElPWLphlgdopShQnCZU1dHA8l NMilEMJ4sYgcfhgIxmGXozOLU1T21tatBMMJTPkU4EcTd6EZ9HjWITszHRbNMDgWIhjW VkeQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=6fikndBnrEebyCh6F08UPUuck03CmAx6aho1AMBz6FQ=; b=eaBT/B37u2CG5emFbrOWavaSymcPF5G8+qO+FMoba4aPsznzn2WZkgYYfQR701Piui XM7R+ujF1P06jN1ylggCqn25DkNI0dyYtUI2q4Fv4hxOU0Ps9zoTsmbVMwYeoAZ8wnwr kjPgt9OpvAUft/H9MB6laJACQP5MaxT+jQk8wWhP2ZSTf2VjTurNPPxZ3hq3guzvQh6B Wdl3GFv6oKX00vbVLxEK6y5wktFheLdLoMHWNFTop5AKyv6MzsxPTFQEX/HqzPjVyOz8 flRIx2SbR7DQb6TzwuNg3umon2pfX8/CyRdOp9p961Ktk4C009o3rqgzlMHqdlD+LvqW xRnQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVc2hBc2o+oPwrMgNQIvwI5b+kYWoHhFkVitQGa4/Dk04wgTWt+ 00ygmupx1s+j4qpCIS/Zj3m2V8DnkVp0tSgKp6WflA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxfnX5hu+73Yx18Cuo1eRLZ31HrnRCAaeQc91KzR+06giaq2wPEeYJfPp1B6RMZkR4bdVuaSUOCRrDKhIE4hXQ= X-Received: by 2002:a02:9042:: with SMTP id y2mr22929336jaf.113.1554756563069; Mon, 08 Apr 2019 13:49:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190208150826.44EBC68DD2@newverein.lst.de> <20190208151011.0807668DD3@newverein.lst.de> <20190408152309.GJ6139@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> In-Reply-To: <20190408152309.GJ6139@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> From: Ard Biesheuvel Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 22:49:13 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/5] arm64: replace -pg with CC_FLAGS_FTRACE in efi Makefiles To: Mark Rutland Cc: Torsten Duwe , Will Deacon , Catalin Marinas , Julien Thierry , Steven Rostedt , Josh Poimboeuf , Ingo Molnar , Arnd Bergmann , AKASHI Takahiro , Amit Daniel Kachhap , linux-arm-kernel , Linux Kernel Mailing List , live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 at 17:23, Mark Rutland wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 04:10:11PM +0100, Torsten Duwe wrote: > > In preparation for arm64 supporting ftrace built on other compiler > > options, let's have makefiles remove the $(CC_FLAGS_FTRACE) > > flags, whatever these may be, rather than assuming '-pg'. > > While at it, fix arm32 as well. > > > > There should be no functional change as a result of this patch. > > > > Signed-off-by: Torsten Duwe > > Ard, would you be happy if we were to take this via the arm64 tree? > > Assuming so, can we have your ack? > Sure Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel