From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752091AbdHGNmP (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Aug 2017 09:42:15 -0400 Received: from mail-it0-f42.google.com ([209.85.214.42]:34874 "EHLO mail-it0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751677AbdHGNmO (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Aug 2017 09:42:14 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1502112980.16683.6.camel@mtkswgap22> References: <1502103886-19725-1-git-send-email-miles.chen@mediatek.com> <20170807131608.GA18817@arm.com> <1502112980.16683.6.camel@mtkswgap22> From: Ard Biesheuvel Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 14:42:13 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: correct modules range of kernel virtual memory layout To: Miles Chen Cc: Will Deacon , Catalin Marinas , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, wsd_upstream@mediatek.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 7 August 2017 at 14:36, Miles Chen wrote: > On Mon, 2017-08-07 at 14:18 +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >> On 7 August 2017 at 14:16, Will Deacon wrote: >> > On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 07:04:46PM +0800, Miles Chen wrote: >> >> The commit f80fb3a3d508 ("arm64: add support for kernel ASLR") >> >> moved module virtual address to >> >> [module_alloc_base, module_alloc_base + MODULES_VSIZE). >> >> >> >> Display module information of the virtual kernel >> >> memory layout by using module_alloc_base. >> >> >> >> testing output: >> >> 1) Current implementation: >> >> Virtual kernel memory layout: >> >> modules : 0xffffff8000000000 - 0xffffff8008000000 ( 128 MB) >> >> 2) this patch + KASLR: >> >> Virtual kernel memory layout: >> >> modules : 0xffffff8000560000 - 0xffffff8008560000 ( 128 MB) >> >> 3) this patch + KASLR and a dummy seed: >> >> Virtual kernel memory layout: >> >> modules : 0xffffffa7df637000 - 0xffffffa7e7637000 ( 128 MB) >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Miles Chen >> >> --- >> >> arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 5 +++-- >> >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> > >> > Does this mean the modules code in our pt dumper is busted >> > (arch/arm64/mm/dump.c)? Also, what about KASAN, which uses these addresses >> > too (in kasan_init)? Should we just remove MODULES_VADDR and MODULES_END >> > altogether? >> > > The module range is not randomized if CONFIG_KASAN is enabled. > (arch/arm64/kernel/kaslr.c) >> >> I don't think we need this patch. The 'module' line simply prints the >> VA region that is reserved for modules. The fact that we end up >> putting them elsewhere when running randomized does not necessarily >> mean this line should reflect that. > > The Kernel virtual layout info should be as correct as possible > or we should remove the "modules line" in the kernel address layout > since it does not show the correct information. > That is your opinion. I disagree.