From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
"linux-efi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com>,
Robert Richter <rrichter@cavium.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 1/5] efi: ARM/arm64: ignore DT memory nodes instead of removing them
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 13:20:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu8fOKqLrnbre7sHko+hPd3wq_O6U5Ev27tN3zEc7W8Mww@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160223121648.GI3966@arm.com>
On 23 February 2016 at 13:16, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 11:58:05AM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 05:58:19PM -0800, David Daney wrote:
>> > From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
>> >
>> > There are two problems with the UEFI stub DT memory node removal
>> > routine:
>> > - it deletes nodes as it traverses the tree, which happens to work
>> > but is not supported, as deletion invalidates the node iterator;
>> > - deleting memory nodes entirely may discard annotations in the form
>> > of additional properties on the nodes.
>> >
>> > Since the discovery of DT memory nodes occurs strictly before the
>> > UEFI init sequence, we can simply clear the memblock memory table
>> > before parsing the UEFI memory map. This way, it is no longer
>> > necessary to remove the nodes, so we can remove that logic from the
>> > stub as well.
>>
>> This is a little bit scary, but I guess this works.
>>
>> My only concern is that when we get kexec, a subsequent kernel must also
>> have EFI memory map support, or things go bad for the next EFI-aware
>> kernel after that (as things like the runtime services may have been
>> corrupted by the kernel in the middle). It's difficult to fix the
>> general case later.
>>
>> A different option would be to support status="disabled" for the memory
>> nodes, and ignore these in early_init_dt_scan_memory. That way a kernel
>> cannot use memory without first having parsed the EFI memory map, and we
>> can still get NUMA info from the disabled nodes.
>
> So in that case, the middle, non-EFI kernel would fail to boot?
> Realistically, once you've kexec'd a non-EFI payload, I don't think you
> can rely on the EFI state remaining intact for future EFI applications.
>
> Is this really something we should be trying to police in the kernel?
>
Well, we could add entries to /reserved-memory in the stub for all the
regions UEFI cares about, that would probably be sufficient to fix
this case.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-23 12:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-23 1:58 [PATCH v12 0/5] arm64, numa: Add numa support for arm64 platforms David Daney
2016-02-23 1:58 ` [PATCH v12 1/5] efi: ARM/arm64: ignore DT memory nodes instead of removing them David Daney
2016-02-23 11:58 ` Mark Rutland
2016-02-23 12:16 ` Will Deacon
2016-02-23 12:20 ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2016-02-23 22:12 ` Rob Herring
2016-02-24 19:38 ` Mark Rutland
2016-02-24 19:03 ` Frank Rowand
2016-02-24 19:30 ` Rob Herring
2016-02-24 19:33 ` Mark Rutland
2016-02-23 1:58 ` [PATCH v12 2/5] Documentation, dt, numa: dt bindings for NUMA David Daney
2016-02-23 1:58 ` [PATCH v12 3/5] dt, numa: Add NUMA dt binding implementation David Daney
2016-02-29 17:29 ` Robert Richter
2016-02-29 18:13 ` David Daney
2016-02-29 19:45 ` Robert Richter
2016-02-29 22:56 ` David Daney
2016-02-23 1:58 ` [PATCH v12 4/5] arm64, numa: Add NUMA support for arm64 platforms David Daney
2016-02-23 10:26 ` Will Deacon
2016-02-23 17:34 ` David Daney
2016-02-23 17:39 ` David Daney
2016-02-26 18:53 ` Will Deacon
2016-02-26 19:51 ` David Daney
2016-02-27 4:13 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-02-29 10:12 ` Robert Richter
2016-02-29 17:34 ` Robert Richter
2016-02-29 23:42 ` David Daney
2016-03-01 12:21 ` Robert Richter
2016-02-23 1:58 ` [PATCH v12 5/5] arm64, mm, numa: Add NUMA balancing support for arm64 David Daney
2016-02-26 18:53 ` Will Deacon
2016-02-26 19:26 ` David Daney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAKv+Gu8fOKqLrnbre7sHko+hPd3wq_O6U5Ev27tN3zEc7W8Mww@mail.gmail.com \
--to=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=david.daney@cavium.com \
--cc=ddaney.cavm@gmail.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=rrichter@cavium.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).