linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
To: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@android.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64/module: Optimize module load time by optimizing PLT counting
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2020 17:29:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu8rwTntUjd83+s07n+4ki+ON0Gkqao0ZgAF9haAw71dTA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200623011803.91232-1-saravanak@google.com>

On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 at 03:27, Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> wrote:
>
> When loading a module, module_frob_arch_sections() tries to figure out
> the number of PLTs that'll be needed to handle all the RELAs. While
> doing this, it tries to dedupe PLT allocations for multiple
> R_AARCH64_CALL26 relocations to the same symbol. It does the same for
> R_AARCH64_JUMP26 relocations.
>
> To make checks for duplicates easier/faster, it sorts the relocation
> list by type, symbol and addend. That way, to check for a duplicate
> relocation, it just needs to compare with the previous entry.
>
> However, sorting the entire relocation array is unnecessary and
> expensive (O(n log n)) because there are a lot of other relocation types
> that don't need deduping or can't be deduped.
>
> So this commit partitions the array into entries that need deduping and
> those that don't. And then sorts just the part that needs deduping. And
> when CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE is disabled, the sorting is skipped entirely
> because PLTs are not allocated for R_AARCH64_CALL26 and R_AARCH64_JUMP26
> if it's disabled.
>
> This gives significant reduction in module load time for modules with
> large number of relocations with no measurable impact on modules with a
> small number of relocations. In my test setup with CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE
> enabled, these were the results for a few downstream modules:
>
> Module          Size (MB)
> wlan            14
> video codec     3.8
> drm             1.8
> IPA             2.5
> audio           1.2
> gpu             1.8
>
> Without this patch:
> Module          Number of entries sorted        Module load time (ms)
> wlan            243739                          283
> video codec     74029                           138
> drm             53837                           67
> IPA             42800                           90
> audio           21326                           27
> gpu             20967                           32
>
> Total time to load all these module: 637 ms
>
> With this patch:
> Module          Number of entries sorted        Module load time (ms)
> wlan            22454                           61
> video codec     10150                           47
> drm             13014                           40
> IPA             8097                            63
> audio           4606                            16
> gpu             6527                            20
>
> Total time to load all these modules: 247
>
> Time saved during boot for just these 6 modules: 390 ms
>
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>

[I am no longer at Linaro so please don't use my @linaro.org address]

> Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
> ---
>
> v1 -> v2:
> - Provided more details in the commit text
> - Pulled in Will's comments on the coding style
> - Pulled in Ard's suggestion about skipping jumps with the same section
>   index (parts of Will's suggested code)
>
>  arch/arm64/kernel/module-plts.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/module-plts.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/module-plts.c
> index 65b08a74aec6..0ce3a28e3347 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/module-plts.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/module-plts.c
> @@ -253,6 +253,40 @@ static unsigned int count_plts(Elf64_Sym *syms, Elf64_Rela *rela, int num,
>         return ret;
>  }
>
> +static bool branch_rela_needs_plt(Elf64_Sym *syms, Elf64_Rela *rela,
> +                                 Elf64_Word dstidx)
> +{
> +
> +       Elf64_Sym *s = syms + ELF64_R_SYM(rela->r_info);
> +
> +       if (s->st_shndx == dstidx)
> +               return false;
> +
> +       return ELF64_R_TYPE(rela->r_info) == R_AARCH64_JUMP26 ||
> +              ELF64_R_TYPE(rela->r_info) == R_AARCH64_CALL26;
> +}
> +
> +/* Group branch PLT relas at the front end of the array. */
> +static int partition_branch_plt_relas(Elf64_Sym *syms, Elf64_Rela *rela,
> +                                     int numrels, Elf64_Word dstidx)
> +{
> +       int i = 0, j = numrels - 1;
> +
> +       if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE))
> +               return 0;
> +
> +       while (i < j) {
> +               if (branch_rela_needs_plt(syms, &rela[i], dstidx))
> +                       i++;
> +               else if (branch_rela_needs_plt(syms, &rela[j], dstidx))
> +                       swap(rela[i], rela[j]);

Nit: would be slightly better to put

  swap(rela[i++], rela[j]);

here so the next iteration of the loop will not call
branch_rela_needs_plt() on rela[i] redundantly. But the current code
is also correct.





> +               else
> +                       j--;
> +       }
> +
> +       return i;
> +}
> +
>  int module_frob_arch_sections(Elf_Ehdr *ehdr, Elf_Shdr *sechdrs,
>                               char *secstrings, struct module *mod)
>  {
> @@ -290,7 +324,7 @@ int module_frob_arch_sections(Elf_Ehdr *ehdr, Elf_Shdr *sechdrs,
>
>         for (i = 0; i < ehdr->e_shnum; i++) {
>                 Elf64_Rela *rels = (void *)ehdr + sechdrs[i].sh_offset;
> -               int numrels = sechdrs[i].sh_size / sizeof(Elf64_Rela);
> +               int nents, numrels = sechdrs[i].sh_size / sizeof(Elf64_Rela);
>                 Elf64_Shdr *dstsec = sechdrs + sechdrs[i].sh_info;
>
>                 if (sechdrs[i].sh_type != SHT_RELA)
> @@ -300,8 +334,14 @@ int module_frob_arch_sections(Elf_Ehdr *ehdr, Elf_Shdr *sechdrs,
>                 if (!(dstsec->sh_flags & SHF_EXECINSTR))
>                         continue;
>
> -               /* sort by type, symbol index and addend */
> -               sort(rels, numrels, sizeof(Elf64_Rela), cmp_rela, NULL);
> +               /*
> +                * sort branch relocations requiring a PLT by type, symbol index
> +                * and addend
> +                */
> +               nents = partition_branch_plt_relas(syms, rels, numrels,
> +                                                  sechdrs[i].sh_info);
> +               if (nents)
> +                       sort(rels, nents, sizeof(Elf64_Rela), cmp_rela, NULL);
>
>                 if (!str_has_prefix(secstrings + dstsec->sh_name, ".init"))
>                         core_plts += count_plts(syms, rels, numrels,
> --
> 2.27.0.111.gc72c7da667-goog
>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-07-02 15:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-23  1:18 [PATCH v2] arm64/module: Optimize module load time by optimizing PLT counting Saravana Kannan
2020-06-23 16:12 ` Will Deacon
2020-07-02 11:24 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-07-02 15:29 ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2020-07-04  0:47   ` Saravana Kannan
2020-07-04 12:09     ` Will Deacon
2020-07-04 13:47       ` Ard Biesheuvel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAKv+Gu8rwTntUjd83+s07n+4ki+ON0Gkqao0ZgAF9haAw71dTA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=saravanak@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).