From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@redhat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-efi <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>,
Russ Anderson <rja@hpe.com>, Mike Travis <mike.travis@hpe.com>,
Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@hpe.com>,
Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@hpe.com>, stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch v2 1/4] efi/x86: turn EFI runtime semaphore into a global lock
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 20:38:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu90BQ8ZAtu5K7FHTto7uGM3974Dtcch07B+8QvWJwwQFg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190207173808.GE6398@sarge.linuxathome.me>
On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 at 18:38, Hedi Berriche <hedi.berriche@hpe.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 16:05 Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 at 05:23, Hedi Berriche <hedi.berriche@hpe.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Make efi_runtime_lock semaphore global so that it can be used by EFI
> >> runtime callers that may be defined outside efi/runtime-wrappers.c.
> >>
> >> Also now that efi_runtime_lock semaphore is no longer static, rename it
> >> to efi_runtime_sem so it doesn't clash with the efi_runtime_lock spinlock
> >> defined in arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c when CONFIG_EFI_MIXED is
> >> enabled.
> >>
> >> The immediate motivation of this change is to serialise UV platform BIOS
> >> calls using the efi_runtime_sem semaphore.
> >>
> >> No functional changes.
> >>
> >> Cc: Russ Anderson <rja@hpe.com>
> >> Cc: Mike Travis <mike.travis@hpe.com>
> >> Cc: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@hpe.com>
> >> Cc: Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@hpe.com>
> >> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> >> Signed-off-by: Hedi Berriche <hedi.berriche@hpe.com>
> >
> >Hello Hedi,
>
> Hi Ard,
>
> >Same feedback as on v1: please don't rename the lock.
>
> With the efi_runtime_lock semaphore being no longer static, not renaming it
> will cause a compile failure as it will clash with the declaration of the
> efi_runtime_lock *spinlock* in arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c in the
> CONFIG_EFI_MIXED case.
>
Ah right, it's in the commit log, as requested. Apologies for not spotting that.
Given how UV is a bit of an outlier, I'd prefer it if we could make
this functionality a bit more light weight, by only exposing the lock
if needed, and not create a global symbol for an internal lock if we
can avoid it.
Could you please try something along the lines of
--- a/drivers/firmware/efi/runtime-wrappers.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/runtime-wrappers.c
@@ -146,6 +146,10 @@
*/
static DEFINE_SEMAPHORE(efi_runtime_lock);
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_UV
+extern struct semaphore __efi_uv_runtime_lock __alias(efi_runtime_lock);
+#endif
+
/*
* Calls the appropriate efi_runtime_service() with the appropriate
* arguments.
and add a declaration
extern struct semaphore __efi_uv_runtime_lock;
to bios_uv.c itself rather than to a header file? You can combine this
with your changes in patch #4 (and drop the first patch entirely)
Also, I noticed that there is some CONFIG_EFI guarded code in
bios_uv.c while the whole file already depends on CONFIG_EFI via the
Kconfig symbol. Perhaps you could include a patch to clean that up as
well? Thanks.
> >> ---
> >> drivers/firmware/efi/runtime-wrappers.c | 60 ++++++++++++-------------
> >> include/linux/efi.h | 3 ++
> >> 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/runtime-wrappers.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/runtime-wrappers.c
> >> index 8903b9ccfc2b..ec60d6227925 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/runtime-wrappers.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/runtime-wrappers.c
> >> @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ struct efi_runtime_work efi_rts_work;
> >> * @rts_arg<1-5>: efi_runtime_service() function arguments
> >> *
> >> * Accesses to efi_runtime_services() are serialized by a binary
> >> - * semaphore (efi_runtime_lock) and caller waits until the work is
> >> + * semaphore (efi_runtime_sem) and caller waits until the work is
> >> * finished, hence _only_ one work is queued at a time and the caller
> >> * thread waits for completion.
> >> */
> >> @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ void efi_call_virt_check_flags(unsigned long flags, const char *call)
> >> * none of the remaining functions are actually ever called at runtime.
> >> * So let's just use a single lock to serialize all Runtime Services calls.
> >> */
> >> -static DEFINE_SEMAPHORE(efi_runtime_lock);
> >> +DEFINE_SEMAPHORE(efi_runtime_sem);
> >>
> >> /*
> >> * Calls the appropriate efi_runtime_service() with the appropriate
> >> @@ -233,10 +233,10 @@ static efi_status_t virt_efi_get_time(efi_time_t *tm, efi_time_cap_t *tc)
> >> {
> >> efi_status_t status;
> >>
> >> - if (down_interruptible(&efi_runtime_lock))
> >> + if (down_interruptible(&efi_runtime_sem))
> >> return EFI_ABORTED;
> >> status = efi_queue_work(GET_TIME, tm, tc, NULL, NULL, NULL);
> >> - up(&efi_runtime_lock);
> >> + up(&efi_runtime_sem);
> >> return status;
> >> }
> >>
> >> @@ -244,10 +244,10 @@ static efi_status_t virt_efi_set_time(efi_time_t *tm)
> >> {
> >> efi_status_t status;
> >>
> >> - if (down_interruptible(&efi_runtime_lock))
> >> + if (down_interruptible(&efi_runtime_sem))
> >> return EFI_ABORTED;
> >> status = efi_queue_work(SET_TIME, tm, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);
> >> - up(&efi_runtime_lock);
> >> + up(&efi_runtime_sem);
> >> return status;
> >> }
> >>
> >> @@ -257,11 +257,11 @@ static efi_status_t virt_efi_get_wakeup_time(efi_bool_t *enabled,
> >> {
> >> efi_status_t status;
> >>
> >> - if (down_interruptible(&efi_runtime_lock))
> >> + if (down_interruptible(&efi_runtime_sem))
> >> return EFI_ABORTED;
> >> status = efi_queue_work(GET_WAKEUP_TIME, enabled, pending, tm, NULL,
> >> NULL);
> >> - up(&efi_runtime_lock);
> >> + up(&efi_runtime_sem);
> >> return status;
> >> }
> >>
> >> @@ -269,11 +269,11 @@ static efi_status_t virt_efi_set_wakeup_time(efi_bool_t enabled, efi_time_t *tm)
> >> {
> >> efi_status_t status;
> >>
> >> - if (down_interruptible(&efi_runtime_lock))
> >> + if (down_interruptible(&efi_runtime_sem))
> >> return EFI_ABORTED;
> >> status = efi_queue_work(SET_WAKEUP_TIME, &enabled, tm, NULL, NULL,
> >> NULL);
> >> - up(&efi_runtime_lock);
> >> + up(&efi_runtime_sem);
> >> return status;
> >> }
> >>
> >> @@ -285,11 +285,11 @@ static efi_status_t virt_efi_get_variable(efi_char16_t *name,
> >> {
> >> efi_status_t status;
> >>
> >> - if (down_interruptible(&efi_runtime_lock))
> >> + if (down_interruptible(&efi_runtime_sem))
> >> return EFI_ABORTED;
> >> status = efi_queue_work(GET_VARIABLE, name, vendor, attr, data_size,
> >> data);
> >> - up(&efi_runtime_lock);
> >> + up(&efi_runtime_sem);
> >> return status;
> >> }
> >>
> >> @@ -299,11 +299,11 @@ static efi_status_t virt_efi_get_next_variable(unsigned long *name_size,
> >> {
> >> efi_status_t status;
> >>
> >> - if (down_interruptible(&efi_runtime_lock))
> >> + if (down_interruptible(&efi_runtime_sem))
> >> return EFI_ABORTED;
> >> status = efi_queue_work(GET_NEXT_VARIABLE, name_size, name, vendor,
> >> NULL, NULL);
> >> - up(&efi_runtime_lock);
> >> + up(&efi_runtime_sem);
> >> return status;
> >> }
> >>
> >> @@ -315,11 +315,11 @@ static efi_status_t virt_efi_set_variable(efi_char16_t *name,
> >> {
> >> efi_status_t status;
> >>
> >> - if (down_interruptible(&efi_runtime_lock))
> >> + if (down_interruptible(&efi_runtime_sem))
> >> return EFI_ABORTED;
> >> status = efi_queue_work(SET_VARIABLE, name, vendor, &attr, &data_size,
> >> data);
> >> - up(&efi_runtime_lock);
> >> + up(&efi_runtime_sem);
> >> return status;
> >> }
> >>
> >> @@ -330,12 +330,12 @@ virt_efi_set_variable_nonblocking(efi_char16_t *name, efi_guid_t *vendor,
> >> {
> >> efi_status_t status;
> >>
> >> - if (down_trylock(&efi_runtime_lock))
> >> + if (down_trylock(&efi_runtime_sem))
> >> return EFI_NOT_READY;
> >>
> >> status = efi_call_virt(set_variable, name, vendor, attr, data_size,
> >> data);
> >> - up(&efi_runtime_lock);
> >> + up(&efi_runtime_sem);
> >> return status;
> >> }
> >>
> >> @@ -350,11 +350,11 @@ static efi_status_t virt_efi_query_variable_info(u32 attr,
> >> if (efi.runtime_version < EFI_2_00_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION)
> >> return EFI_UNSUPPORTED;
> >>
> >> - if (down_interruptible(&efi_runtime_lock))
> >> + if (down_interruptible(&efi_runtime_sem))
> >> return EFI_ABORTED;
> >> status = efi_queue_work(QUERY_VARIABLE_INFO, &attr, storage_space,
> >> remaining_space, max_variable_size, NULL);
> >> - up(&efi_runtime_lock);
> >> + up(&efi_runtime_sem);
> >> return status;
> >> }
> >>
> >> @@ -369,12 +369,12 @@ virt_efi_query_variable_info_nonblocking(u32 attr,
> >> if (efi.runtime_version < EFI_2_00_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION)
> >> return EFI_UNSUPPORTED;
> >>
> >> - if (down_trylock(&efi_runtime_lock))
> >> + if (down_trylock(&efi_runtime_sem))
> >> return EFI_NOT_READY;
> >>
> >> status = efi_call_virt(query_variable_info, attr, storage_space,
> >> remaining_space, max_variable_size);
> >> - up(&efi_runtime_lock);
> >> + up(&efi_runtime_sem);
> >> return status;
> >> }
> >>
> >> @@ -382,11 +382,11 @@ static efi_status_t virt_efi_get_next_high_mono_count(u32 *count)
> >> {
> >> efi_status_t status;
> >>
> >> - if (down_interruptible(&efi_runtime_lock))
> >> + if (down_interruptible(&efi_runtime_sem))
> >> return EFI_ABORTED;
> >> status = efi_queue_work(GET_NEXT_HIGH_MONO_COUNT, count, NULL, NULL,
> >> NULL, NULL);
> >> - up(&efi_runtime_lock);
> >> + up(&efi_runtime_sem);
> >> return status;
> >> }
> >>
> >> @@ -395,14 +395,14 @@ static void virt_efi_reset_system(int reset_type,
> >> unsigned long data_size,
> >> efi_char16_t *data)
> >> {
> >> - if (down_interruptible(&efi_runtime_lock)) {
> >> + if (down_interruptible(&efi_runtime_sem)) {
> >> pr_warn("failed to invoke the reset_system() runtime service:\n"
> >> "could not get exclusive access to the firmware\n");
> >> return;
> >> }
> >> efi_rts_work.efi_rts_id = RESET_SYSTEM;
> >> __efi_call_virt(reset_system, reset_type, status, data_size, data);
> >> - up(&efi_runtime_lock);
> >> + up(&efi_runtime_sem);
> >> }
> >>
> >> static efi_status_t virt_efi_update_capsule(efi_capsule_header_t **capsules,
> >> @@ -414,11 +414,11 @@ static efi_status_t virt_efi_update_capsule(efi_capsule_header_t **capsules,
> >> if (efi.runtime_version < EFI_2_00_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION)
> >> return EFI_UNSUPPORTED;
> >>
> >> - if (down_interruptible(&efi_runtime_lock))
> >> + if (down_interruptible(&efi_runtime_sem))
> >> return EFI_ABORTED;
> >> status = efi_queue_work(UPDATE_CAPSULE, capsules, &count, &sg_list,
> >> NULL, NULL);
> >> - up(&efi_runtime_lock);
> >> + up(&efi_runtime_sem);
> >> return status;
> >> }
> >>
> >> @@ -432,11 +432,11 @@ static efi_status_t virt_efi_query_capsule_caps(efi_capsule_header_t **capsules,
> >> if (efi.runtime_version < EFI_2_00_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION)
> >> return EFI_UNSUPPORTED;
> >>
> >> - if (down_interruptible(&efi_runtime_lock))
> >> + if (down_interruptible(&efi_runtime_sem))
> >> return EFI_ABORTED;
> >> status = efi_queue_work(QUERY_CAPSULE_CAPS, capsules, &count,
> >> max_size, reset_type, NULL);
> >> - up(&efi_runtime_lock);
> >> + up(&efi_runtime_sem);
> >> return status;
> >> }
> >>
> >> diff --git a/include/linux/efi.h b/include/linux/efi.h
> >> index 45ff763fba76..930cd20842b8 100644
> >> --- a/include/linux/efi.h
> >> +++ b/include/linux/efi.h
> >> @@ -1745,6 +1745,9 @@ extern struct efi_runtime_work efi_rts_work;
> >> /* Workqueue to queue EFI Runtime Services */
> >> extern struct workqueue_struct *efi_rts_wq;
> >>
> >> +/* EFI runtime semaphore */
> >> +extern struct semaphore efi_runtime_sem;
> >> +
> >> struct linux_efi_memreserve {
> >> int size; // allocated size of the array
> >> atomic_t count; // number of entries used
> >> --
> >> 2.20.1
> >>
>
> --
> Be careful of reading health books, you might die of a misprint.
> -- Mark Twain
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-07 19:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-07 4:22 [Patch v2 0/4] Protect against concurrent calls into UV BIOS Hedi Berriche
2019-02-07 4:22 ` [Patch v2 1/4] efi/x86: turn EFI runtime semaphore into a global lock Hedi Berriche
2019-02-07 16:05 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-02-07 17:38 ` Hedi Berriche
2019-02-07 19:38 ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2019-02-12 17:25 ` Hedi Berriche
2019-02-12 17:26 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-02-12 23:46 ` Hedi Berriche
2019-02-07 4:22 ` [Patch v2 2/4] x86/platform/UV: kill uv_bios_call_reentrant() as it has no callers Hedi Berriche
2019-02-07 4:22 ` [Patch v2 3/4] x86/platform/UV: use efi_enabled() instead of test_bit() Hedi Berriche
2019-02-07 4:22 ` [Patch v2 4/4] x86/platform/UV: use efi_runtime_sem to serialise BIOS calls Hedi Berriche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAKv+Gu90BQ8ZAtu5K7FHTto7uGM3974Dtcch07B+8QvWJwwQFg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=bhsharma@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mike.travis@hpe.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rja@hpe.com \
--cc=sivanich@hpe.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steve.wahl@hpe.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).