From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762522AbdAKIHd (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jan 2017 03:07:33 -0500 Received: from mail-it0-f53.google.com ([209.85.214.53]:37102 "EHLO mail-it0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755643AbdAKIGz (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jan 2017 03:06:55 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20170110143340.GA3787@gondor.apana.org.au> <20170110143913.GA3822@gondor.apana.org.au> <20170111031124.GA4515@gondor.apana.org.au> <20170111043541.GA4944@gondor.apana.org.au> From: Ard Biesheuvel Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 08:06:54 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: x86-64: Maintain 16-byte stack alignment To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Herbert Xu , Andrew Lutomirski , Linux Crypto Mailing List , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11 January 2017 at 06:53, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Jan 10, 2017 8:36 PM, "Herbert Xu" wrote: > > > Sure we can ban the use of attribute aligned on stacks. But > what about indirect uses through structures? > > > It should be pretty trivial to add a sparse warning for that, though. > Couldn't we update the __aligned(x) macro to emit 32 if arch == x86 and x == 16? All other cases should work just fine afaict