From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_MED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5F2FC432C0 for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 20:15:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA75A20659 for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 20:15:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="Tvfmu6fN" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727124AbfKYUP3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Nov 2019 15:15:29 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-f66.google.com ([209.85.216.66]:38472 "EHLO mail-pj1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725818AbfKYUP3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Nov 2019 15:15:29 -0500 Received: by mail-pj1-f66.google.com with SMTP id f7so7107828pjw.5 for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 12:15:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=XE60qzqDDu/QSjZjM0/sTKyHZau5FHQqXZ2FkpPYMQ4=; b=Tvfmu6fNo0X7N2hDoy1ZSL5LaOeluQOOtwT+s5EGjVd6BOcRLYs4xGowdfCdk51tO6 AhMuMoJNLGPjiTx3JdosGUR4BFsD3dbMLWPgodWZYMtGvgXPtNVnwQH/VbpyP6sA3GqC skb5v6u+BoD56WLQ2UhJ0lzRcKLqv+uvyd553G3k7VZO8xO3IH81VyVziblEBh8hsyRW fBl0mYMeRIVesm+JZZB8iL8n1sr/ASSIuhO5/p2vPmUdO+g4TO0ypBpnF1vuKC90i+IG RkPNLrs5bZrJRNBh8fjBNm2oH4mnKvMyBLhpLH6pDqhZ34I3eubl5ETq0//t7QdHOgNE xGWQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XE60qzqDDu/QSjZjM0/sTKyHZau5FHQqXZ2FkpPYMQ4=; b=IUxCFcMCOv+9MPZ4DUAY4rcDcI4RIdoXGOppASjWpIFcEQOylKfboeDYbLzz8rijWH MFXMsepsTF6RWZggHwLTNzgdPgRB+YTVqP+BAP20rB/pD4sU1np5/D4E5Ien/8fI8zci pUUrxpaWgEVUeClCmh0F1edbJMEXSsNnKcHuXXfCZJytGScX+X2NFMnIYPSxr1boXzWC GrRbZqpPb4NuhipET8eifq1Vr3mgYIq8P/hV4e8q/Blwx8Wd0V5on5GML8jAMumKxDUb A9hc+aBBNZCrzqUonPwntedzbZL2Jr3k8lWGAE8MfAB6cr6PCLNJMz5UA2KRadvO/XJ4 UXzw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX8c61dy/rzz6fW1/+s8mqvCg9BMpiLZjlovS6A1yH7oaIwsbr1 oPE71mA9egS3+FHaMI2GxNi97vQjG9E8MXWQ8JRvaw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwZYrafkMC3y4LZBHlZmLbkinEnmRRGqd2iB0KYH6aoz+ch5bNaghIA+nnyiYgF9bK/LY57MupABQMOzzPNfv0= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:be05:: with SMTP id a5mr1039257pjs.73.1574712928322; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 12:15:28 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191014025101.18567-1-natechancellor@gmail.com> <20191119045712.39633-1-natechancellor@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20191119045712.39633-1-natechancellor@gmail.com> From: Nick Desaulniers Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 12:15:17 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] LLVM/Clang fixes for a few defconfigs To: Michael Ellerman Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , linuxppc-dev , LKML , clang-built-linux , Nathan Chancellor Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Michael, Do you have feedback for Nathan? Rebasing these patches is becoming a nuisance for our CI, and we would like to keep building PPC w/ Clang. On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 8:57 PM Nathan Chancellor wrote: > > Hi all, > > This series includes a set of fixes for LLVM/Clang when building > a few defconfigs (powernv, ppc44x, and pseries are the ones that our > CI configuration tests [1]). The first patch fixes pseries_defconfig, > which has never worked in mainline. The second and third patches fixes > issues with all of these configs due to internal changes to LLVM, which > point out issues with the kernel. > > These have been broken since July/August, it would be nice to get these > reviewed and applied. Please let me know what I can do to get these > applied soon so we can stop applying them out of tree. > > [1]: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/continuous-integration > > Previous versions: > > v3: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190911182049.77853-1-natechancellor@gmail.com/ > > v4: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191014025101.18567-1-natechancellor@gmail.com/ > > Cheers, > Nathan > > -- Thanks, ~Nick Desaulniers