From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BE68C433E2 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 20:53:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BACF520771 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 20:53:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="eKmxCli6" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727992AbgIOUxY (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Sep 2020 16:53:24 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37576 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728073AbgIOUuG (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Sep 2020 16:50:06 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x441.google.com (mail-pf1-x441.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::441]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 274F5C061788 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 13:49:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x441.google.com with SMTP id n14so2651650pff.6 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 13:49:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=KQN0ednkgp1zJbGZ3MuZGCQdVZKsdpv3cYQ+zMKOR/U=; b=eKmxCli6MAqjY825CYelH6OIonf5Kf4aN0AJbKAbb3tgva1GEd2E18A+o3pewdS23X z6kLSv1OxiZ3mRrQOYxwBFciQ8fF0x9CBYWX4z3JDSvwOgNqaywZvLu6wPwIDms23dTM IJsTh08Nq+lR12VR0+CeRIIYiVofX0CNyAFRBRNKy5lG9sjuysRlXVgBkPRFg7PntW8L aihzI46Fyg0rV36sVWuuTF7EnkjicepY8S6nA8oaamNcOEcHmrcOVsBt+FpuYObpzsrb 3e1lAST/oxL7U4cUa8vv2nvxVyIk664l6SWG7OiPgmiW3aYyeHHwgOBW/yVqTPI8x5CZ EOOQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=KQN0ednkgp1zJbGZ3MuZGCQdVZKsdpv3cYQ+zMKOR/U=; b=WzZLYl8agO3g0DSCRTjG/BP7Nb2tkQkSOhqjFOkGTgvHgfZ8ktlVH82OzYAA/hNjQf oJwJW0yLPXlPJPOtvV6kxbFDHavTN5rfYrW+iKdET2EqLTYUDPOMyliCZg/IupWCW4QC 5Gl54IU0N78K9kQe9+XHIvHGmsSo0s3dEv4oJG8spnYr7EquMsno/QzER9Uv3AXeYBPr rcAP54SBWm3yf9d4RTrOh36qmqceMc1lg13UpABGuNRSpe7ME9UpfIg1NPOFagmJNYHq m4iEUnlunqZ2GqEc8bwOyZELyvv4/EESBcJz0o0rvQ+223oqToV3vu7xSzQCxAIualAY uZ3Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530ZkHnARFXtVUOhcg2b3T8ubHaTFcf4kHAofP/nya4Wvr11ijop 7MEdOBPnhUNgnYN32EVgLqn1fBqz4/kzLPq8lek9iA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxFB963MU65B1a9E7v2Mmlq6zNB1cmrCZMdoVfcNU5+bqnQPe0WDctIZ71Y0529lskt2ixBiBT3IkTU2jKiMXg= X-Received: by 2002:a63:7882:: with SMTP id t124mr6286483pgc.381.1600202998459; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 13:49:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <664e5923-d65e-0a3a-1320-8b6635146676@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <664e5923-d65e-0a3a-1320-8b6635146676@redhat.com> From: Nick Desaulniers Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 13:49:46 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: linux tooling mailing list To: postmaster@vger.kernel.org Cc: Sedat Dilek , Nick Clifton , =?UTF-8?B?RsSBbmctcnXDrCBTw7JuZw==?= , Peter Zijlstra , Segher Boessenkool , Rasmus Villemoes , clang-built-linux , LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello postmaster, Any thoughts on linux-toolchains@vger.kernel.org? On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 3:14 AM Nick Clifton wrote: > > Hi Guys, > > >>>> Would it be possible to setup: > >>>> linux-tooling@vger.kernel.org > > >>> s/linux-tooling/linux-toolchains (better plural toolchains) > > >> FWIW FreeBSD names it "freebsd-toolchain". > >> NetBSD names it "tech-toolchain". > >> > >> I'd slightly prefer the singular form. > > > OK with singular form. > > > > I was thinking of GNU and LLVM toolchain*s* - that's why the plural. > > Personally I prefer the plural too, but it is not a big issue. > > I am however delighted that it looks like this idea will go ahead. -- Thanks, ~Nick Desaulniers