From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
jpoimboe@kernel.org, jbaron@akamai.com, ardb@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, erhard_f@mailbox.org,
mhiramat@kernel.org, sandipan.das@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1.1 3/3] x86/static_call: Add support for Jcc tail-calls
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 10:14:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKwvOdmE4bHdOr4TCm0EKrqKjMWk52NAkEOOd9JgsbUFaknOrw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y9Kdg9QjHkr9G5b5@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 7:34 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 10:07:53AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Jan 2023 14:06:49 +0100
> > Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> >
> > > > Just to confirm, as it's not clear if this is the static call site or one
> > > > of the functions that is being called.
> > >
> > > Ah, you've not looked at enough asm then? ;-) Yes this is the static
> > > call site, see the __SCT_ target (instruction at 0x35d).
> >
> > Yeah, could you specify it a bit more in the change log such that those
> > looking back at this don't have to have that requirement of staring at
> > enough asm ;-)
>
> How's this then?
>
> ---
> Subject: x86/static_call: Add support for Jcc tail-calls
> From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Date: Fri Jan 20 16:40:33 CET 2023
>
> Clang likes to create conditional tail calls like:
>
> 0000000000000350 <amd_pmu_add_event>:
> 350: 0f 1f 44 00 00 nopl 0x0(%rax,%rax,1) 351: R_X86_64_NONE __fentry__-0x4
> 355: 48 83 bf 20 01 00 00 00 cmpq $0x0,0x120(%rdi)
> 35d: 0f 85 00 00 00 00 jne 363 <amd_pmu_add_event+0x13> 35f: R_X86_64_PLT32 __SCT__amd_pmu_branch_add-0x4
> 363: e9 00 00 00 00 jmp 368 <amd_pmu_add_event+0x18> 364: R_X86_64_PLT32 __x86_return_thunk-0x4
If it helps reduce the line width in the commit message to focus on
just the instructions, lately I've been using
`--no-addresses --no-show-raw-insn` flags to llvm-objdump.
In my ~/.zshrc, I have this function:
dis () {
file=$1
func=$2
llvm-objdump -Dr --no-addresses --no-show-raw-insn
--disassemble-symbols=$func $file
}
Which let me run `dis vmlinux amd_pmu_add_event` or `dis foo.o func`.
Sometimes I don't want `-r` or `--no-show-raw-insn or
`--no-addresses`, but most of the time I do.
--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-26 18:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-23 20:59 [PATCH 0/3] static_call/x86: Handle clang's conditional tail calls Peter Zijlstra
2023-01-23 20:59 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86/alternative: Introduce int3_emulate_jcc() Peter Zijlstra
2023-01-31 14:22 ` [tip: x86/alternatives] x86/alternatives: " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2023-01-23 20:59 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86/alternative: Teach text_poke_bp() to patch Jcc.d32 instructions Peter Zijlstra
2023-01-31 14:22 ` [tip: x86/alternatives] x86/alternatives: " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2023-01-23 20:59 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86/static_call: Add support for Jcc tail-calls Peter Zijlstra
2023-01-23 22:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-01-24 13:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-01-24 15:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-01-26 15:34 ` [PATCH v1.1 " Peter Zijlstra
2023-01-26 18:14 ` Nick Desaulniers [this message]
2023-02-06 16:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-01-31 14:22 ` [tip: x86/alternatives] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2023-02-08 22:36 ` [PATCH 0/3] static_call/x86: Handle clang's conditional tail calls Nathan Chancellor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAKwvOdmE4bHdOr4TCm0EKrqKjMWk52NAkEOOd9JgsbUFaknOrw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=erhard_f@mailbox.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sandipan.das@amd.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).