From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5866CC2D0E4 for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 22:28:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E45D924248 for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 22:28:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="oxyyGnn2" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728819AbgKQW2z (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Nov 2020 17:28:55 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60112 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728184AbgKQW2y (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Nov 2020 17:28:54 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-x644.google.com (mail-pl1-x644.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::644]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF6BEC0613CF for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 14:28:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pl1-x644.google.com with SMTP id u2so11062982pls.10 for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 14:28:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=l+l6bPNdAyGzxXdbN4WyqDuDuPAZPzRdy+08/xBki4g=; b=oxyyGnn2pbqzNcAh7Ro5v/5q+r5L0/p8tgKM5bY5Amc103WXnHI72zTmNIl9EKzGUP hx+MTwWTcvuW+rL3rnEp3nVYrbexUS+150D5tGwQ7D80hcO9gUlWErWSaBGVadR7zLv7 WEN+YlkXUTrpAr8XzzyDVMXB68lyehw2wG25TORvlwowlCEIbqmEalhfueDvU6V4t8xQ 3F0PhD/cM5Y2wpMOOwp68iwtNEfMy7WD8y3fh9XUK9zFP1R82KM7z8aRDE/zDmieqzLF 2CR9WVPP7zoYKtH/jT86zIJKogoA6Y755rDX953a0ITuhls5qVkiVB7fPVgjYXcvmrn+ k2Wg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=l+l6bPNdAyGzxXdbN4WyqDuDuPAZPzRdy+08/xBki4g=; b=jRV0O/Pv4f7W6Jlcu0xtYfibttroQLB0mwgbnktnhT0o2Rce5CJu4nXim/+/HpvAkM ZaCDIB+YqQex7wq6oyyM8VekxAlHzyUdn6+GqHT8ULPTXBE6bDkDMk7ym//scPw1BCtY +E4zxIhOf1yMB994y/Qe3tTva6/IcII3n2lPji+u0cUxEzDybycpCoCSnPBRNQNTojWk XsbSvribyimbLnq/t+couf72a6NVymKr67dGer7MTI0X4YUYQsV/qwJSQ6ALh2TdGxrB H1OVWwqrxuyQtn2kklYaWjRznlxP+8Gvf3xAMGkmSgLYB9tyzLkwNz0hMivzy+QWFDH0 j2wQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531WUIbpWuBetVnyCn9Ym2T23Sawd/uKIbC3cg2Ue5NG0CCqwMQd 6C1fD8IeHpEykt7liuXHKbxSfanirTUQ8jsyaUh/2Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxWXioFAPozNpXYIDJ3H6sf8MNf9Tby1TCVJwkV7fzb9RpugKiB0p81VLrblJcCJB4KyhP3+HCdilQdR+vYEIM= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:e901:b029:d8:e727:2595 with SMTP id k1-20020a170902e901b02900d8e7272595mr1537952pld.56.1605652134074; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 14:28:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201116043532.4032932-1-ndesaulniers@google.com> <20201116043532.4032932-3-ndesaulniers@google.com> <20201117030214.GB1340689@ubuntu-m3-large-x86> <20201117221629.GA4679@embeddedor> In-Reply-To: <20201117221629.GA4679@embeddedor> From: Nick Desaulniers Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 14:28:43 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Revert "lib: Revert use of fallthrough pseudo-keyword in lib/" To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" Cc: Michael Ellerman , Nathan Chancellor , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , clang-built-linux , linuxppc-dev , LKML , Miguel Ojeda Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 2:16 PM Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > > I'm happy to take this series in my tree. I'm planing to send a > pull-request for -rc5 with more related changes. So, I can include > this in the same PR. > > In the meantime I'll add this to my testing tree, so it can be > build-tested by the 0-day folks. :) SGTM, and thank you. I'm sure you saw the existing warning about indentation. Do we want to modify the revert patch, or put another patch on top? -- Thanks, ~Nick Desaulniers