linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	"Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hardening: Default to INIT_STACK_ALL_ZERO if CC_HAS_AUTO_VAR_INIT_ZERO
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 12:22:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKwvOdmP6mYwZ+0Z5iXFv5dtd_96SxYsUn469ZC=C=SFw-Hs-A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202109141214.630BB3A@keescook>

On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 12:14 PM Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 11:53:38AM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > Rather than create 2 new kconfigs with 1 new invocation of the
> > compiler via cc-option, how about just adding an `ifdef
> > CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG` guard around adding the obnoxious flag to
> > `KBUILD_CFLAGS` in the top level Makefile?
>
> v2:

LGTM
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>

I think the formal patch should have Will's Suggested-by on it.

>
> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> index 34a0afc3a8eb..72d165ffabdb 100644
> --- a/Makefile
> +++ b/Makefile
> @@ -831,12 +831,12 @@ endif
>
>  # Initialize all stack variables with a zero value.
>  ifdef CONFIG_INIT_STACK_ALL_ZERO
> -# Future support for zero initialization is still being debated, see
> -# https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45497. These flags are subject to being
> -# renamed or dropped.
>  KBUILD_CFLAGS  += -ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero
> +ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG
> +# https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45497
>  KBUILD_CFLAGS  += -enable-trivial-auto-var-init-zero-knowing-it-will-be-removed-from-clang
>  endif
> +endif
>
>  # While VLAs have been removed, GCC produces unreachable stack probes
>  # for the randomize_kstack_offset feature. Disable it for all compilers.
> diff --git a/security/Kconfig.hardening b/security/Kconfig.hardening
> index 90cbaff86e13..ded17b8abce2 100644
> --- a/security/Kconfig.hardening
> +++ b/security/Kconfig.hardening
> @@ -23,13 +23,16 @@ config CC_HAS_AUTO_VAR_INIT_PATTERN
>         def_bool $(cc-option,-ftrivial-auto-var-init=pattern)
>
>  config CC_HAS_AUTO_VAR_INIT_ZERO
> +       # GCC ignores the -enable flag, so we can test for the feature with
> +       # a single invocation using the flag, but drop it as appropriate in
> +       # the Makefile, depending on the presence of Clang.
>         def_bool $(cc-option,-ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero -enable-trivial-auto-var-init-zero-knowing-it-will-be-removed-from-clang)
>
>  choice
>         prompt "Initialize kernel stack variables at function entry"
>         default GCC_PLUGIN_STRUCTLEAK_BYREF_ALL if COMPILE_TEST && GCC_PLUGINS
>         default INIT_STACK_ALL_PATTERN if COMPILE_TEST && CC_HAS_AUTO_VAR_INIT_PATTERN
> -       default INIT_STACK_ALL_ZERO if CC_HAS_AUTO_VAR_INIT_PATTERN
> +       default INIT_STACK_ALL_ZERO if CC_HAS_AUTO_VAR_INIT_ZERO
>         default INIT_STACK_NONE
>         help
>           This option enables initialization of stack variables at
>
> --
> Kees Cook



-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-14 19:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-14 10:28 [PATCH] hardening: Default to INIT_STACK_ALL_ZERO if CC_HAS_AUTO_VAR_INIT_ZERO Will Deacon
2021-09-14 15:58 ` Nathan Chancellor
2021-09-14 17:21   ` Kees Cook
2021-09-14 18:53     ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-09-14 19:09       ` Kees Cook
2021-09-14 19:14       ` Kees Cook
2021-09-14 19:22         ` Nick Desaulniers [this message]
2021-09-14 19:36         ` Nathan Chancellor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAKwvOdmP6mYwZ+0Z5iXFv5dtd_96SxYsUn469ZC=C=SFw-Hs-A@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).