From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4904C46470 for ; Tue, 7 Aug 2018 16:47:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 808E6216ED for ; Tue, 7 Aug 2018 16:47:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="mLpLeNmQ" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 808E6216ED Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388992AbeHGTCI (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Aug 2018 15:02:08 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-f196.google.com ([209.85.210.196]:37070 "EHLO mail-pf1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732347AbeHGTCH (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Aug 2018 15:02:07 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-f196.google.com with SMTP id a26-v6so8860689pfo.4 for ; Tue, 07 Aug 2018 09:46:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=wvjdyjZFysYghJFwZIyIQ9LDMH4n0lBwqwbJTUJTCBY=; b=mLpLeNmQ4EFaCigGlTjVRng1VJioQ1kyTzhHl6cEW9wrCBppl7KYfn6+fNDwD9MKid bGZtlzKD0xZ0AtJj9TgYiMZU/pKrS2UUc+MftRbHdjkJzwqjhd5NzPVfZp7A6exMjRyc wXxrQF8m/6j1p7zIRiIUfarycSR1FYIQqZ38K+iq6LRW1VmElyGkaeEt94K5cOA/k5NO pgyO0yQLTV7bsE2P8bSTMxpAtOs4ts+e2klopry2Rn+7PXHRoY2rUXE6n2kXB/UPcYI6 uzdCFj1O6UhQiayXuOW1PGwoM5BK38vuEFygBNML1Ei4sxb2xhhX7Io0KvoQEwXJ0sF7 y8Lg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=wvjdyjZFysYghJFwZIyIQ9LDMH4n0lBwqwbJTUJTCBY=; b=isaW7apTbb52J6doFPWrYYo7/2mgdVxezYrYRxWJkqKXou1lPmFxeXGAZoFDjar1ig NUAMmJcRDKYqgsZmqHPyzOgRCCMLJCTKerMuzLnDx13bFtbj/gXySaoow3INWvROTYNe 7HlE1tYg0Dzipu0tQH0AKnV+BVrFxD0ftZTx+27fJLGcrfa5tEUsfYY4jHifCt32BOWk Itr79FiSmk3nfPQV2+ZUrlN2NLAYPbyqNCX7oJkv6AeqDY/7drp+xhfFEoNub25qMplT z9vMd+4Fi8TGXIVm8Lto58i3q0+1JxjvCtXL5gpgPD5p22QYentxh5ArLstmLQS7gb6y X15g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlGaopWd7zjeBNVWCRa1x9PHaxjiFzZ3F3cVB7boGI+A9krGDs8o 81EJJunxJSp1M/H/Ey/i9QqZrQcIr2SDwW2QbNbFuw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpdjaobo9pzHe+NBUnpZn2K7gnzFQ46BikPHiFTgYIdh3frgVf1+mLvET+dC/3IGO5FOOBT2wawNiPYNELCVYuY= X-Received: by 2002:a63:e914:: with SMTP id i20-v6mr19500676pgh.10.1533660417971; Tue, 07 Aug 2018 09:46:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20180803170550.164688-1-ndesaulniers@google.com> In-Reply-To: From: Nick Desaulniers Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2018 09:46:46 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/irqflags: Provide a declaration for native_save_fl To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: hpa@zytor.com, david.laight@aculab.com, LKML , jdelvare@suse.de, Ingo Molnar , linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org, sedat.dilek@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 12:29 AM Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Mon, 6 Aug 2018, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 5, 2018 at 1:33 PM tip-bot for Nick Desaulniers > > wrote: > > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > > > > Not sure if this was going to be cleaned up in an automated way, but > > looks like this commit message drops the comment to stable as to how > > far back it should go: > > > > # 4.17, 4.14, 4.9, 4.4 > > The Fixes tag is enough. If the upstream commit was backported, then the > tools of the stable folks will find it and know exactly how far it needs to > go back. Oh, cool. > > also, there were tested by's reported: > > > > Tested-by: David Laight > > Tested-by: Sedat Dilek > > Which came in after I applied it.... I've seen other maintainers revise commit messages before sending pull requests along, but I guess that's problematic as anyone else who has pulled before the revision would then have a merge conflict. -- Thanks, ~Nick Desaulniers