From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8094C4708F for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 14:40:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 910C9613BF for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 14:40:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231370AbhFBOmL (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jun 2021 10:42:11 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41462 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230169AbhFBOmK (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jun 2021 10:42:10 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-x231.google.com (mail-oi1-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::231]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6AFFC06174A for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 07:40:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oi1-x231.google.com with SMTP id v142so2433840oie.9 for ; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 07:40:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=RWVAxqbt2ragLnej0S2guhkFqxl9f5X2TG9vofPgr5g=; b=pIK5I0OJGNcUZKY6fYRPbWFjK/lbB/dhyRXSbbm+CTTMFSRjrlWjvL5G5XGfbhX3K6 CGKXNujPs93Tr1f+duXmLRro7Rtvvd3PeoeSAXXamUOCFow3NZdJtOCk5nQkQ2yerRhJ lAX7VU/YBPjMjMeh1RioPTnUaliC6N+lg0eaH0xWmF9VxYspJTWHZjWx1kX9HAPNSlMQ 33kL5izgAkE9rx0Rp6qUuU8yFyE8JEVfvqBSI5MjHgAdwniQ7cKoSUlr/71XclJ92/G3 A13Bxker1PmlMbws/jkuzEZs0rumjVtvDPb5kh1183ZsbwmdsA971Gu2+kYYPbWqqoes 5fdQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=RWVAxqbt2ragLnej0S2guhkFqxl9f5X2TG9vofPgr5g=; b=mnYsKsj0aJMqQbLD/4OXiswAQEnhvzc3KQEcKiPq/9tdE0cTtCBKsHQtTPQcRjAEyB BfzILNx+1Oly8ruYl65ffXcrzW2zyAdyuCBORfiNDdPaPDxQdR9Bw+jrVmLM30UNi9ZO kgeyJo548YOkH3I4L/V3p+5EOpso7h3DQZzFpUKzEJsgOqL4uW+xenEELLpX4m3aKyD3 ZduCBKeOId2/Q9FN8zrHcNlbuYk+1pouSFpliPgW1ZM772RI+TN7mhTzg51lo82s4UCX er+YAcxLSfzE1z+aqKUDp09cAgT7Ah3MUVLL62HH7VGTo6a7wzzC1Bk4lZbBh47ddW9O ibgg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531tZhM+7pmhRHBhENFkODLLIqjQVnboMWm6a3Pw93KSGX0pGLOj NoaOUI+hXABBeVx1x15Acl+IA11THg2mxnqKH/o= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw9W8YmUacJHRTLRKCSRcE6AT1Zu3kRNDtCEpiYsKWDEmet6F863hn0P5W2iDFQ+YX04vhuiOFjMdEZ014wjcU= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:244:: with SMTP id m4mr3971937oie.37.1622644813198; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 07:40:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210602133659.46158-1-manikishanghantasala@gmail.com> <9a3878fd-3b59-76f5-ddc7-625c66f9fee8@ieee.org> In-Reply-To: From: Manikishan Ghantasala Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 20:09:27 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: greybus: fixed the coding style, labels should not be indented. To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Alex Elder , Rui Miguel Silva , Johan Hovold , Alex Elder , greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, Thanks for the clarification. Regards, Manikishan Ghantasala On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 at 20:07, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 07:57:35PM +0530, Manikishan Ghantasala wrote: > > Sending this mail again as I missed to reply to all. > > Hi Alex, > > > > I agree those are called bit-field member names rather than labels. > > But the reason I mentioned is because the ./scripts/checkpatch.pl > > gave out a warning saying "labels should not be indented". > > checkpatch is a perl script that does it's best, but does not always get > it right. In this case, it is incorrect, the existing code is just > fine. > > thanks, > > greg k-h