From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A304DC6FD1C for ; Mon, 13 Mar 2023 13:16:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229879AbjCMNQK (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Mar 2023 09:16:10 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51628 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229619AbjCMNQH (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Mar 2023 09:16:07 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x531.google.com (mail-ed1-x531.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::531]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 465952A172; Mon, 13 Mar 2023 06:16:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-x531.google.com with SMTP id j11so48569748edq.4; Mon, 13 Mar 2023 06:16:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1678713364; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=Qy+YS68/6ftY+Izh4xyJcJqKqdESz2LS/MZ0geP5yPA=; b=YnuuOHAYq1T+ZvSgf2QAedSw5b5Xr0j6v9e8XSa18yrLb2jlA/cwfLTDYEv74eo3/J +o+5gif4mY1RZvvlvX2pgC/wRkatMEaFhhrMxhgFqE8ab3zYi9vyn7MIwHLzHjOFy1dr QbrXp6vun4ehCQNGRAyp1VhxjG0KTW0ymgVxpkNpwGsGR6PimFd3ZKZu+QcQBNNoqGk6 0Vb+0BOjXbgJSk6J+4rRsTCZmxqZpOHG37WL0YKIUiL/xFYJRPBasw3x+0s6qhm3Qern kzBD5BXqZgNsuTl8qxJwJfB/JBqiiH0SGgp7C7Umm+AtTiACVVz81KIEhu9avIe6JasJ nkYg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1678713364; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Qy+YS68/6ftY+Izh4xyJcJqKqdESz2LS/MZ0geP5yPA=; b=JQAzxiDTFXUA3Sw8YXcgETq6W4rwN9Ohf2wwz1W+pWZNXrz44RPNdbw5FoeCu9PchY H4w7YgLK1syocC/eOe8RfZSHX6bxvI8dZykk7IM2gXLbHJO+Z8FWYbnOb0nca4nQlaW5 aZbiFxfvDy+MqUHBDLbBFB0JCX/M8hgyUyzTd6P0hkJ/vepdncmriUrMIjAvTeHpoPFp fY26rbXg9N8C4rWsszNdJx9i/UIefqr9wwZ4Ih2Z2EfiE64ZFigQyiQZ0w8sjkDb3cV1 8jZX5SDgNP/JgoUAmUN+JsKCQkRMDKUlzgsvYba7T64z+AlcUs8e6wx8L1KSUmFPpgGp 0bpQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKW9/2k1e/II2GguXWuMuXlE9SsSJyzkXTVL/HVNSaNyXkjuvtsJ WiBZJX72Djt1hr8wYw/iFoqUiVDJZKCuF6w1UqQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set/ijfRMDLlYd+8w9hfgR1/DCZnCowu3rqEJL5mX6JUz8GNk2PObZFFeIxC0FLdRrEvqkxYMWv+3xKGMCu6ZwLM= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:60f:b0:8dd:70a:3a76 with SMTP id s15-20020a170906060f00b008dd070a3a76mr17904962ejb.11.1678713363722; Mon, 13 Mar 2023 06:16:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20230311151756.83302-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Jason Xing Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 21:15:27 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net-sysfs: display two backlog queue len separately To: Eric Dumazet Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jason Xing Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 8:34=E2=80=AFPM Eric Dumazet = wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 7:18=E2=80=AFAM Jason Xing wrote: > > > > From: Jason Xing > > > > Sometimes we need to know which one of backlog queue can be exactly > > long enough to cause some latency when debugging this part is needed. > > Thus, we can then separate the display of both. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jason Xing > > --- > > net/core/net-procfs.c | 17 ++++++++++++----- > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/net/core/net-procfs.c b/net/core/net-procfs.c > > index 1ec23bf8b05c..97a304e1957a 100644 > > --- a/net/core/net-procfs.c > > +++ b/net/core/net-procfs.c > > @@ -115,10 +115,14 @@ static int dev_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, voi= d *v) > > return 0; > > } > > > > -static u32 softnet_backlog_len(struct softnet_data *sd) > > +static u32 softnet_input_pkt_queue_len(struct softnet_data *sd) > > { > > - return skb_queue_len_lockless(&sd->input_pkt_queue) + > > - skb_queue_len_lockless(&sd->process_queue); > > + return skb_queue_len_lockless(&sd->input_pkt_queue); > > +} > > + > > +static u32 softnet_process_queue_len(struct softnet_data *sd) > > +{ > > + return skb_queue_len_lockless(&sd->process_queue); > > } > > > > static struct softnet_data *softnet_get_online(loff_t *pos) > > @@ -169,12 +173,15 @@ static int softnet_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq,= void *v) > > * mapping the data a specific CPU > > */ > > seq_printf(seq, > > - "%08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %= 08x %08x %08x\n", > > + "%08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %= 08x %08x %08x " > > + "%08x %08x\n", > > sd->processed, sd->dropped, sd->time_squeeze, 0, > > 0, 0, 0, 0, /* was fastroute */ > > 0, /* was cpu_collision */ > > sd->received_rps, flow_limit_count, > > - softnet_backlog_len(sd), (int)seq->index); > > + 0, /* was len of two backlog queues */ > > You can not pretend the sum is zero, some user space tools out there > would be fooled. > > > + (int)seq->index, > > + softnet_input_pkt_queue_len(sd), softnet_process_que= ue_len(sd)); > > return 0; > > } > > > > -- > > 2.37.3 > > > > In general I would prefer we no longer change this file. Fine. Since now, let this legacy file be one part of history. > > Perhaps add a tracepoint instead ? Thanks, Eric. It's one good idea. It seems acceptable if we only need to trace two separate backlog queues where it can probably hit the limit, say, in the enqueue_to_backlog(). Similarly I decide to write another two tracepoints of time_squeeze and budget_squeeze which I introduced to distinguish from time_squeeze as the below link shows: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAL+tcoAwodpnE2NjMLPhBbmHUvmKMgSykqx0EQ4YZaQHj= rx0Hw@mail.gmail.com/. For that change, any suggestions are deeply welcome :) Thanks, Jason