From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Allen Hung <allen_hung@dell.com>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>,
"linux-input@vger.kernel.org" <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "HID: multitouch: enable palm rejection if device implements confidence usage"
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 10:38:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALCETrUwUkx3sdup2zbVn0n1Hegi5qwk1OHzTYYpLYkP95Tykg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrWhHWeqGK6zmng=+8_N87cezi6EwO7xW96HoMTxTkzxeQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> This and patch 2 are:
>>
>> Tested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> # XPS 13 9350, BIOS 1.4.3
>>
>> (And I'm curious why 1.4.3 seems to have been pulled. Might it have been
>> this issue? For better or for worse, I upgraded in the narrow window in
>> which it was available on Dell's website.)
>>
>
> I should amend that Tested-by slightly: these patches seem to make the
> problem merely about as bad as it was before. It's still not perfect
> -- I still occasionally get stuck touches.
On further investigation, I'm not getting stuck touches AFAICT. I'm
experiencing an upgraded version of libinput being clever and
incorrectly deciding that I middle-clicked. Sorry for the noise.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96710
--Andy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-28 17:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-23 8:31 [PATCH 1/2] Revert "HID: multitouch: enable palm rejection if device implements confidence usage" Allen Hung
2016-06-23 8:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] HID: multitouch: enable palm rejection for Windows Precision Touchpad Allen Hung
2016-06-27 14:18 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2016-06-27 17:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] Revert "HID: multitouch: enable palm rejection if device implements confidence usage" Andy Lutomirski
2016-06-27 22:25 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-06-28 17:38 ` Andy Lutomirski [this message]
2016-06-28 11:26 ` Jiri Kosina
2016-06-27 22:13 ` [1/2] " Mario Limonciello
2016-06-29 18:31 ` Mario Limonciello
2016-06-30 7:39 ` Jiri Kosina
2016-06-30 14:43 ` Mario_Limonciello
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CALCETrUwUkx3sdup2zbVn0n1Hegi5qwk1OHzTYYpLYkP95Tykg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=allen_hung@dell.com \
--cc=benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).