From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932671AbcINSWX (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Sep 2016 14:22:23 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f174.google.com ([209.85.161.174]:35439 "EHLO mail-yw0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752151AbcINSWV (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Sep 2016 14:22:21 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160914145556.5whqcpzys7c23nib@treble> References: <7cd5e328dc75d8ccd912e5783665de34503f7c63.1473801993.git.luto@kernel.org> <20160914145556.5whqcpzys7c23nib@treble> From: Andy Lutomirski Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 11:22:00 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/12] x86/dumpstack: Pin the target stack in save_stack_trace_tsk() To: Josh Poimboeuf Cc: Andy Lutomirski , X86 ML , Borislav Petkov , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Brian Gerst , Jann Horn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 02:29:28PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> This will prevent a crash if the target task dies before or while >> dumping its stack once we start freeing task stacks early. >> >> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski > > Do we need a similar patch for show_stack()? Probably. Shouldn't it go in show_stack_log_lvl() instead, though?