From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753430AbaE2WuR (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2014 18:50:17 -0400 Received: from mail-ve0-f175.google.com ([209.85.128.175]:49594 "EHLO mail-ve0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752425AbaE2WuN (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2014 18:50:13 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5387B7A0.3030302@windriver.com> References: <5387B7A0.3030302@windriver.com> From: Andy Lutomirski Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 15:49:52 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86,vdso: vdso build fixes and improvements To: Paul Gortmaker Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , Josh Boyer , Ingo Molnar , LKML , "tglx@linutronix.de" , "linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" , Stephen Rothwell Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > On 14-05-29 05:57 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> Patch 1 causes make;make to behave similarly to make if vdso2c fails. >> Patch 2 hopefully fixes x86 crossbuilds on big-endian machines. I don't >> have a big-endian machine to test on, though. > > Since the x86 builds are unconditionally failing as-is now in > linux-next, perhaps Stephen [Cc'd] can layer these on the top of > the tree he'll be making within the next couple of hours to give > them a big-endian test. Stephen, if you do this, could you also send me some of the build outputs: arch/x86/vdso/*.so.dbg arch/x86/vdso/*-image-*.c I'd like to verify that the output is correct. It would be unfortunate if the cross-built kernel had some subtle error. Thanks, Andy