From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
To: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>
Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>, Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>,
linux-audit@redhat.com,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Begin auditing SECCOMP_RET_ERRNO return actions
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2017 21:57:15 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALCETrW7sYuUG12DQzgj1pui16KufdBU_3kMw7s3g5oaPpebDg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1483375990-14948-1-git-send-email-tyhicks@canonical.com>
On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 8:53 AM, Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com> wrote:
> This patch set creates the basis for auditing information specific to a given
> seccomp return action and then starts auditing SECCOMP_RET_ERRNO return
> actions. The audit messages for SECCOMP_RET_ERRNO return actions include the
> errno value that will be returned to userspace.
>
Not that I'm opposed to the idea, but what's the intended purpose?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-03 5:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-02 16:53 [PATCH 0/2] Begin auditing SECCOMP_RET_ERRNO return actions Tyler Hicks
2017-01-02 16:53 ` [PATCH 1/2] seccomp: Allow for auditing functionality specific to " Tyler Hicks
2017-01-02 16:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] seccomp: Audit SECCOMP_RET_ERRNO actions with errno values Tyler Hicks
2017-01-02 17:20 ` Steve Grubb
2017-01-02 17:42 ` Tyler Hicks
2017-01-02 18:49 ` Steve Grubb
2017-01-02 22:55 ` Paul Moore
2017-01-02 22:47 ` [PATCH 0/2] Begin auditing SECCOMP_RET_ERRNO return actions Paul Moore
2017-01-03 5:56 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-01-03 19:31 ` Paul Moore
2017-01-03 13:31 ` Tyler Hicks
2017-01-03 19:42 ` Paul Moore
2017-01-03 20:44 ` Kees Cook
2017-01-03 20:53 ` Steve Grubb
2017-01-03 20:54 ` Paul Moore
2017-01-03 21:03 ` Kees Cook
2017-01-03 21:13 ` Paul Moore
2017-01-03 21:21 ` Kees Cook
2017-01-03 21:31 ` Paul Moore
2017-01-03 21:44 ` Kees Cook
2017-01-04 1:58 ` Tyler Hicks
2017-01-04 4:43 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2017-01-04 6:31 ` Kees Cook
2017-01-04 2:04 ` Tyler Hicks
2017-01-03 5:57 ` Andy Lutomirski [this message]
2017-01-03 13:53 ` Tyler Hicks
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CALCETrW7sYuUG12DQzgj1pui16KufdBU_3kMw7s3g5oaPpebDg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=tyhicks@canonical.com \
--cc=wad@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).