Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] x86/umwait: Add sysfs interface to control umwait C0.2 state

[Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>]

On Sun, Jun 9, 2019 at 9:14 PM Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 08, 2019 at 03:52:03PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 3:10 PM Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > C0.2 state in umwait and tpause instructions can be enabled or disabled
> > > on a processor through IA32_UMWAIT_CONTROL MSR register.
> > >
> >
> > > +static u32 get_umwait_control_c02(void)
> > > +{
> > > +       return umwait_control_cached & MSR_IA32_UMWAIT_CONTROL_C02;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static u32 get_umwait_control_max_time(void)
> > > +{
> > > +       return umwait_control_cached & MSR_IA32_UMWAIT_CONTROL_MAX_TIME;
> > > +}
> > > +
> >
> > I'm not convinced that these helpers make the code any more readable.
>
> The helpers reduce length of statements that call them. Otherwise, all of
> the statements would be easily over 80 characters.
>
> Plus, each of the helpers is called multiple places in #0003 and #0004.
> So the helpers make the patches smaller and cleaner.
>

I was imagining things like:

umwait_control_cached &= ~MSR_IA32_UMWAIT_CONTROL_C02;
if (whatever condition)
  umwait_control_cached |= MSR_IA32_UMWAIT_CONTROL_C02;
umwait_control_cached &= ~MSR_IA32_UMWAIT_CONTROL_MAX_TIME;
umwait_control_cached |= new_max_time;

You could save 8 characters by just calling the variable umwait_control.