From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux MIPS Mailing List <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>,
Marcin Nowakowski <marcin.nowakowski@imgtec.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tracing/syscalls: allow multiple syscall numbers per syscall
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 17:01:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALCETrWjipqo3ZfbrrS4MkdFgcisrjvu=CcWe6T-h1HV7tzUrg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160830192818.4e16a674@gandalf.local.home>
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 16:09:04 -0700
> Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> wrote:
>
>> But none of this should be a problem at all for MIPS, right? AFAICT
>> the only problem for MIPS is that there *is* a mapping from metadata
>> to nr. If that mapping got removed, MIPS should just work, right?
>
> Wait, where's the mapping of metadata to nr. I don't see that, nor do I
> see a need for that. The issue is that we have metadata that expresses
> how to record a syscall, and we map syscall nr to metadata, because
> when tracing is active, the only thing we have to find that metadata is
> the syscall nr.
It's in init_ftrace_syscalls():
meta->syscall_nr = i;
and everything that uses that. I think that this is the main problem
that the patch that started this thread changes, and I think that
deleting it would be cleaner than this patch.
>
> Now if a syscall nr has more than one way to record (a single nr for
> multiple syscalls), then we get into trouble. That's why we have
> trouble with compat syscalls. The same number maps to different
> syscalls, and we don't know how to differentiate that.
>
>
>>
>> For x86 compat, I think that adding arch should be sufficient.
>> Specifically, rather than having just one enter_syscall_files array,
>> have one per audit arch. Then call syscall_get_arch() as well as
>> syscall_get_nr() and use both to lookup the metadata. AFAIK this
>> should work on all architectures, although you might need some arch
>> helpers to enumerate all the arches and their respective syscall
>> tables (and max syscall nrs).
>
> OK, if the regs can get us to the arch, then this might work.
>
> That is, perhaps we can have multiple tables (not really sure how to
> make that happen in an arch agnostic way), and then have two functions:
>
> trace_get_syscall_nr(current, regs)
> trace_get_syscall_arch(current, regs)
Sadly, syscall_get_arch() doesn't take a regs parameter -- it looks at
current. If it were made more general, it would need a task pointer,
not a regs pointer, but would just looking at current be okay for
tracing?
syscall_get_arch() does work on all archs that support seccomp filters, though.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-31 0:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-29 9:30 [PATCH 1/2] tracing/syscalls: allow multiple syscall numbers per syscall Marcin Nowakowski
2016-08-29 9:30 ` [PATCH 2/2] MIPS: set NR_syscall_tables appropriately Marcin Nowakowski
2016-09-27 12:04 ` Ralf Baechle
2016-09-28 6:58 ` Marcin Nowakowski
2016-08-29 23:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] tracing/syscalls: allow multiple syscall numbers per syscall Andy Lutomirski
2016-08-30 8:14 ` Marcin Nowakowski
2016-08-30 18:52 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-08-30 19:29 ` Steven Rostedt
2016-08-30 19:53 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-08-30 20:58 ` Steven Rostedt
2016-08-30 21:45 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-08-30 22:03 ` Steven Rostedt
2016-08-30 22:08 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-08-30 22:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2016-08-30 23:09 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-08-30 23:28 ` Steven Rostedt
2016-08-31 0:01 ` Andy Lutomirski [this message]
2016-08-31 14:08 ` Marcin Nowakowski
2016-08-31 7:00 ` Marcin Nowakowski
2016-08-31 8:24 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-09-01 15:24 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CALCETrWjipqo3ZfbrrS4MkdFgcisrjvu=CcWe6T-h1HV7tzUrg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=marcin.nowakowski@imgtec.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).