From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Lazy FPU restoration / moving kernel_fpu_end() to context switch
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 11:53:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALCETrWoDEXzH=y9sqoGWtzLPoeWgpRyUQw5AiCubX4O+UOa3w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6eecf873-9d87-5345-70ba-5c064a31714b@linux.intel.com>
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 11:50 AM Dave Hansen
<dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On 06/15/2018 11:31 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > for (thing) {
> > kernel_fpu_begin();
> > encrypt(thing);
> > kernel_fpu_end();
> > }
>
> Don't forget that the processor has optimizations for this, too. The
> "modified optimization" will notice that between:
>
> kernel_fpu_end(); -> XRSTOR
> and
> kernel_fpu_start(); -> XSAVE(S|OPT)
>
> the processor has not modified the states. It'll skip doing any writes
> of the state. Doing what Andy is describing is still way better than
> letting the processor do it, but you should just know up front that this
> may not be as much of a win as you would expect.
Even with the modified optimization, kernel_fpu_end() still needs to
reload the state that was trashed by the kernel FPU use. If the
kernel is using something like AVX512 state, then kernel_fpu_end()
will transfer an enormous amount of data no matter how clever the CPU
is. And I think I once measured XSAVEOPT taking a hundred cycles or
so even when RFBM==0, so it's not exactly super fast.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-15 18:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-15 13:11 Lazy FPU restoration / moving kernel_fpu_end() to context switch Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-06-15 16:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-15 18:33 ` Brian Gerst
2018-06-15 19:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-15 20:30 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-06-18 9:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-18 15:25 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-06-15 18:31 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-15 18:40 ` Rik van Riel
2018-06-15 18:41 ` Dave Hansen
2018-06-15 18:49 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-15 18:48 ` Dave Hansen
2018-06-15 18:53 ` Andy Lutomirski [this message]
2018-06-15 20:27 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-06-15 20:48 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-06-19 11:43 ` David Laight
2018-06-19 13:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-15 20:33 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-06-15 20:42 ` Dave Hansen
2018-06-15 20:52 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-15 20:56 ` Rik van Riel
2018-07-11 16:28 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-07-11 20:10 ` Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CALCETrWoDEXzH=y9sqoGWtzLPoeWgpRyUQw5AiCubX4O+UOa3w@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).