From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S933343AbcKGSad (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Mon, 7 Nov 2016 13:30:33 -0500
Received: from mail-vk0-f51.google.com ([209.85.213.51]:34284 "EHLO
        mail-vk0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S932846AbcKGSa3 (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 7 Nov 2016 13:30:29 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20161031200729.GA19430@redhat.com>
References: <20161025110508.9052-1-roman.penyaev@profitbricks.com>
 <20161025140333.GB4326@redhat.com> <20161025154301.GA12015@redhat.com>
 <CALCETrVmczve=knhYGrcXkeAXRQR_oY4ac2BSc7V0TEnx6-GFA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20161026141359.GA6893@redhat.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1610261650260.4983@nanos>
 <20161026155155.GA28832@redhat.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1610262027110.5013@nanos>
 <20161028161106.GA8933@redhat.com> <20161031200729.GA19430@redhat.com>
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 10:23:14 -0800
Message-ID: <CALCETrX82dBJo6GASnrPuuaCpaQw9r8X1sYWw_kCBaOMROoH=g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] kthread: kill to_live_kthread()
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Roman Pen <roman.penyaev@profitbricks.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Chunming Zhou <David1.Zhou@amd.com>,
        Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Ping?

What's the current status of this?  Do we need this for 4.9?

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 1:07 PM, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 10/28, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>>
>> I'll try to kill to_live_kthread() tomorrow, didn't have time to do this
>> today.
>
> Hmm. And this looks even simpler than I thought, or I am totally confused.
> Thomas, could you please review this series too?
>
> Chunming, Alex, I _think_ that drm/amdgpu should not use kthread_park(), but
> lets discuss this separately. It would be nice if you can confirm that 2/2
> can't break this code, even if I think "it obviously can't".
>
> Oleg.
>



-- 
Andy Lutomirski
AMA Capital Management, LLC