From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
To: Waiman Long <waiman.long@hp.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@hp.com>,
Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hp.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: SIGSEGV when using "perf record -g" with 3.13-rc* kernel
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 11:56:07 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALCETrXG5k8Pk8ctYPJ_uKhVbyQ9=vVEgLeXb3Zvw+V+JSDMFQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52D04D6D.9010504@hp.com>
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Waiman Long <waiman.long@hp.com> wrote:
> On 01/10/2014 01:54 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Peter Zijlstra<peterz@infradead.org>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 06:02:23PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 05:58:22PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:29:13AM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Peter,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Call Trace:
>>>>>> <NMI> [<ffffffff815710af>] dump_stack+0x49/0x62
>>>>>> [<ffffffff8104e3bc>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0
>>>>>> [<ffffffff8104e40a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20
>>>>>> [<ffffffff8105f1f1>] force_sig_info+0x131/0x140
>>>>>> [<ffffffff81042a4f>] force_sig_info_fault+0x5f/0x70
>>>>>> [<ffffffff8106d8da>] ? search_exception_tables+0x2a/0x50
>>>>>> [<ffffffff81043b3d>] ? fixup_exception+0x1d/0x70
>>>>>> [<ffffffff81042cc9>] no_context+0x159/0x1f0
>>>>>> [<ffffffff81042e8d>] __bad_area_nosemaphore+0x12d/0x230
>>>>>> [<ffffffff81042e8d>] ? __bad_area_nosemaphore+0x12d/0x230
>>>>>> [<ffffffff81042fa3>] bad_area_nosemaphore+0x13/0x20
>>>>>> [<ffffffff81578fc2>] __do_page_fault+0x362/0x480
>>>>>> [<ffffffff81578fc2>] ? __do_page_fault+0x362/0x480
>>>>>> [<ffffffff815791be>] do_page_fault+0xe/0x10
>>>>>> [<ffffffff81575962>] page_fault+0x22/0x30
>>>>>> [<ffffffff815817e4>] ? bad_to_user+0x5e/0x66b
>>>>>> [<ffffffff81285316>] copy_from_user_nmi+0x76/0x90
>>>>>> [<ffffffff81017a20>] perf_callchain_user+0xd0/0x360
>>>>>> [<ffffffff8111f64f>] perf_callchain+0x1af/0x1f0
>>>>>> [<ffffffff81117693>] perf_prepare_sample+0x2f3/0x3a0
>>>>>> [<ffffffff8111a2af>] __perf_event_overflow+0x10f/0x220
>>>>>> [<ffffffff8111ab14>] perf_event_overflow+0x14/0x20
>>>>>> [<ffffffff8101f69e>] intel_pmu_handle_irq+0x1de/0x3c0
>>>>>> [<ffffffff81008e44>] ? emulate_vsyscall+0x144/0x390
>>>>>> [<ffffffff81576e64>] perf_event_nmi_handler+0x34/0x60
>>>>>> [<ffffffff8157664a>] nmi_handle+0x8a/0x170
>>>>>> [<ffffffff81576848>] default_do_nmi+0x68/0x210
>>>>>> [<ffffffff81576a80>] do_nmi+0x90/0xe0
>>>>>> [<ffffffff81575c67>] end_repeat_nmi+0x1e/0x2e
>>>>>> [<ffffffff81008e44>] ? emulate_vsyscall+0x144/0x390
>>>>>> [<ffffffff81008e44>] ? emulate_vsyscall+0x144/0x390
>>>>>> [<ffffffff81008e44>] ? emulate_vsyscall+0x144/0x390
>>>>>> <<EOE>> [<ffffffff81042f7d>] __bad_area_nosemaphore+0x21d/0x230
>>>>>> [<ffffffff81042fa3>] bad_area_nosemaphore+0x13/0x20
>>>>>> [<ffffffff81578fc2>] __do_page_fault+0x362/0x480
>>>>>> [<ffffffff8113cfbc>] ? vm_mmap_pgoff+0xbc/0xe0
>>>>>> [<ffffffff815791be>] do_page_fault+0xe/0x10
>>>>>> [<ffffffff81575962>] page_fault+0x22/0x30
>>>>>> ---[ end trace 037bf09d279751ec ]---
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So this is a double page faults. Looking at relevant changes in
>>>>>> 3.13 kernel, I spotted the following one patch that modified the
>>>>>> perf_callchain_user() function shown up in the stack trace above:
>>>>>>
>>>>> Hurm, that's an expected double fault, not something we should take the
>>>>> process down for.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll have to look at how all that works for a bit.
>>>
>>> Andy, introduced all this in 4fc3490114bb ("x86-64: Set siginfo and
>>> context on vsyscall emulation faults").
>>>
>>> It looks like your initial userspace fault hit the magic button and ends
>>> up in emulate_vsyscall. Right at that point we trigger a PMI, which
>>> tries to do a stack-trace. That stack-trace also stumbles into unmapped
>>> memory (might be the same) and faults again.
>>>
>>> Now at that point, we usually just give up on the callchain and proceed
>>> like normal, however because of this double fault emulate-vsyscall
>>> SIGSEGV magic you loose.
>>>
>>> So the below might well be a valid fix.. Anybody? Andy?
>>
>> Yuck -- when I wrote that thing, I hadn't imagined that an interrupt
>> (there's nothing particularly special about NMIs here, I think) would
>> try to access user memory. The fix below looks okay, but IMO it needs
>> a big fat comment explaining what's going on.
>>
>> Is there a way to ask whether the previous entry into the kernel came
>> from user space? The valid "sig_on_uaccess_error" case happens when
>> the current fault was triggered by a fault from userspace. The
>> invalid case (and any invalid case from, say, an int3 that a
>> tracepoint stuck in there) would be a page fault triggered by a fault
>> handler that in turn started in kernel space (in particular, in
>> emulate_vsyscall).
>
>
> The processes that got the SIGSEGV were all running shell scripts. I am not
> totally sure that they were running in user space when getting the PMIs, but
> are likely the case.
The error you're seeing is:
- Userspace code calls into the vsyscall page (e.g. old code calling
gettimeofday).
- Calls to the vsyscall page trap, so you end up executing in kernel
space in emulate_vsyscall.
- perf is running, so you end up in an NMI handler that triggers
while sig_on_uaccess_fault is true.
- The perf callchain code tries to read from a bad userspace pointer
(not sure why -- the ip value in the vsyscall page *is* readable).
That traps (as expected), but the trap handler injects SIGSEGV due to
sig_on_uaccess_fault==1.
The cleanest fix I can think of is to change the condition to
sig_on_uaccess_fault==1 && (the get_user caller was a single kernel
entry away from userspace). In the failure you're seeing, there was
an NMI in there.
--Andy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-10 19:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-10 15:29 SIGSEGV when using "perf record -g" with 3.13-rc* kernel Waiman Long
2014-01-10 16:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-10 17:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-10 17:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-10 18:54 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-01-10 19:43 ` Waiman Long
2014-01-10 19:56 ` Andy Lutomirski [this message]
2014-01-10 20:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-10 20:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-10 20:28 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-01-15 15:33 ` Waiman Long
2014-01-16 13:39 ` [tip:perf/core] x86, mm, perf: Allow recursive faults from interrupts tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-17 18:10 ` Waiman Long
2014-01-17 19:17 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-01-17 20:08 ` Waiman Long
2014-01-17 21:07 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-01-10 19:37 ` SIGSEGV when using "perf record -g" with 3.13-rc* kernel Waiman Long
2014-01-10 20:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CALCETrXG5k8Pk8ctYPJ_uKhVbyQ9=vVEgLeXb3Zvw+V+JSDMFQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=aswin@hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=scott.norton@hp.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=waiman.long@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).