From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756555Ab2APUQK (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:16:10 -0500 Received: from mail-vw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.212.46]:42095 "EHLO mail-vw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754959Ab2APUQF convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:16:05 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20120116173309.GA21112@redhat.com> References: <7bed6cc87d8f388269a73b1a9a4c9ebd6ac333da.1326673414.git.luto@amacapital.net> <20120116173309.GA21112@redhat.com> From: Andy Lutomirski Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:15:43 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] Add PR_{GET,SET}_NO_NEW_PRIVS to prevent execve from granting privs To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Casey Schaufler , Linus Torvalds , Jamie Lokier , Will Drewry , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, keescook@chromium.org, john.johansen@canonical.com, serge.hallyn@canonical.com, coreyb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, pmoore@redhat.com, eparis@redhat.com, djm@mindrot.org, segoon@openwall.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, jmorris@namei.org, scarybeasts@gmail.com, avi@redhat.com, penberg@cs.helsinki.fi, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, mingo@elte.hu, akpm@linux-foundation.org, khilman@ti.com, borislav.petkov@amd.com, amwang@redhat.com, ak@linux.intel.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, gregkh@suse.de, dhowells@redhat.com, daniel.lezcano@free.fr, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, olofj@chromium.org, mhalcrow@google.com, dlaor@redhat.com, corbet@lwn.net, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 01/15, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> >> --- a/kernel/fork.c >> +++ b/kernel/fork.c >> @@ -1117,6 +1117,8 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(unsigned long clone_flags, >>       if (retval < 0) >>               goto bad_fork_free; >> >> +     p->no_new_privs = current->no_new_privs; > > Again, this is unneeded, ->no_new_privs was copied by dup_task_struct(). Yeah, sorry. Will fix in v3. --Andy