From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
jpa@kernelbug.mail.kapsi.fi, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] selftests/fpu: Add an FPU selftest
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 11:00:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALCETrXXzt8WZMs3dsReCJ5wdF3zhxFmUtGnmdCgV7_exFUKKQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200619174127.22304-3-bp@alien8.de>
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 10:41 AM Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote:
>
> From: Petteri Aimonen <jpa@git.mail.kapsi.fi>
>
> Add a selftest for the usage of FPU code in kernel mode.
>
> Currently only implemented for x86. In the future, kernel FPU testing
> could be unified between the different architectures supporting it.
Acked-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
except:
> +#
> +# CFLAGS for compiling floating point code inside the kernel. x86/Makefile turns
> +# off the generation of FPU/SSE* instructions for kernel proper but FPU_FLAGS
> +# get appended last to CFLAGS and thus override those previous compiler options.
> +#
> +FPU_CFLAGS += -mhard-float -msse
> +ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_GCC
> + ifeq ($(call cc-ifversion, -lt, 0701, y), y)
> + # Stack alignment mismatch, proceed with caution.
> + # GCC < 7.1 cannot compile code using `double` and -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3
> + # (8B stack alignment).
> + FPU_CFLAGS += -mpreferred-stack-boundary=4
> + else
> + FPU_CFLAGS += -msse2
> + endif
> +endif
This should be cc-option, not cc-ifversion, I think. But maybe we
should consider dropping the problematic GCC version instead? The old
GCC versions with stack alignment problems are seriously problematic
for x86 kernels, and I don't really trust kernels built with them.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-19 18:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-19 17:41 [PATCH 0/2] x86/FPU: FPU sanitization for in-kernel use Borislav Petkov
2020-06-19 17:41 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/fpu: Reset MXCSR to default in kernel_fpu_begin() Borislav Petkov
2020-06-19 18:01 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-06-22 17:09 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-06-22 18:33 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-06-22 18:36 ` Petteri Aimonen
2020-06-22 18:38 ` Dave Hansen
2020-06-22 18:40 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-06-22 18:59 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-06-19 17:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] selftests/fpu: Add an FPU selftest Borislav Petkov
2020-06-19 18:00 ` Andy Lutomirski [this message]
2020-06-22 17:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-06-22 18:26 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-06-22 19:01 ` Borislav Petkov
[not found] ` <B4D00859-000A-4F8C-8CFB-45B9BBCCA16D@amacapital.net>
2020-06-23 10:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-06-23 18:22 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-06-23 18:47 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-06-23 19:07 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-23 19:13 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-06-23 20:58 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-23 21:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-06-20 19:55 ` kernel test robot
2020-06-22 17:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-06-22 18:15 ` Nick Desaulniers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CALCETrXXzt8WZMs3dsReCJ5wdF3zhxFmUtGnmdCgV7_exFUKKQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=jpa@kernelbug.mail.kapsi.fi \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).