linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 4/5] sched: Delay task stack freeing on RT
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2021 12:02:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALCETrXk0i50vyWwou0AT0jtb7V2pqZiJW_7_dqrthi1N19qeg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrU7Fu7BA+DEk8HJPRkqsOSsC-NXR2tPsxW6VFF0pxSS6A@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 11:48 AM Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 10:24 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> >

> ISTM it would be conceptually for do_exit() to handle its own freeing
> in its own preemptible context.  Obviously that can't really work,
> since we can't free a task_struct or a task stack while we're running
> on it.  But I wonder if we could approximate it by putting this work
> in a workqueue so that it all runs in a normal schedulable context.
> To make the shell script case work nicely, we want to release the task
> stack before notifying anyone waiting for the dying task to exit, but
> maybe that's doable.  It could involve some nasty exit_signal hackery,
> though.

I'm making this way more complicated than it needs to be.  How about
we unaccount the task stack in do_exit and release it for real in
finish_task_switch()?  Other than accounting, free_thread_stack
doesn't take any locks.

--Andy

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-01 19:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-28 12:24 [patch 0/5] sched: Miscellaneous RT related tweaks Thomas Gleixner
2021-09-28 12:24 ` [patch 1/5] sched: Limit the number of task migrations per batch on RT Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-01 15:05   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-05 14:11   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-09-28 12:24 ` [patch 2/5] sched: Disable TTWU_QUEUE " Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-01 15:05   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-05 14:11   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-09-28 12:24 ` [patch 3/5] sched: Move kprobes cleanup out of finish_task_switch() Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-01 15:05   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-05 14:11   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-09-28 12:24 ` [patch 4/5] sched: Delay task stack freeing on RT Thomas Gleixner
2021-09-29 11:54   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-01 16:12     ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-10-01 17:24       ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-01 18:48         ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-10-01 19:02           ` Andy Lutomirski [this message]
2021-10-01 20:54             ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-09-28 12:24 ` [patch 5/5] sched: Move mmdrop to RCU " Thomas Gleixner
2021-09-29 12:02   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-29 13:05     ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-01 15:05   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-05 14:11   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CALCETrXk0i50vyWwou0AT0jtb7V2pqZiJW_7_dqrthi1N19qeg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).