From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 509D1C43460 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 04:18:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DCF6611C1 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 04:18:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237828AbhDWETV (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Apr 2021 00:19:21 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49290 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229456AbhDWETU (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Apr 2021 00:19:20 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-xd35.google.com (mail-io1-xd35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d35]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59404C061574; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 21:18:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io1-xd35.google.com with SMTP id l21so4519848iob.1; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 21:18:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=9rzZYVq39OR6Qkj8gqXLwD19tpWV3cWzF0YtPe2dTjM=; b=gfiLm60zKUk0E1zjwnRq9DTjBqTOJGkVuT/xyApI/WUJtQsSoVgNpWkk5muLdXHtPZ iaxN97bnFWE5dYHZVhlwtuOXyi5h+3dngh5nOFHQSxnVmxIPQCYtPSD2bNKQnmbTU6Cs tiumUx7v+M2AFRxhO896b5HRTtk44zo/gPNtONClSTt+W7seilUxqpED7411za6x3RZn CO8v9NP6J1XUmiFmwzlIIHAfRx51hm7CJSv+D3BRHiAzfWfVdtzhiC5r7mlaNagv6rOv QN5dEgkIISngYr3eVGAECrZXyuV6o2HYZAnwIZ9Xf2Mr4yH237OkGinM/kIW7KuhNlHY DfHg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9rzZYVq39OR6Qkj8gqXLwD19tpWV3cWzF0YtPe2dTjM=; b=IvGpO2FyplD6425QsGsfeKbw8tKLsoGAho7TD/124XmetB7c5AZl083UFrF5xwMqmH qs7Y+X1jpUHAwv4BBhvL/MaaBlkr30l9CxPS0prLD9FoRzxaQYNIEZuk8s3h9rIMbj2O qOwZj+LPoHvdaswBiM69URH31rcYLhIL/1pCbw5IwjM9m6JslFF+klTVC3pkPOZLlTnQ XT33yDolAqu/o3B02MRQqpWDpEQTTXmcZWuPYvAyoUg6WJOLUTL7p0c0XtzmoQuFS3WT OQ3AWC0gDZelw9Lhx6Fp3eRPL56fQADWOlyxcPiaJozhkZIFNJYWt9dzzN/h9NBrktsI Uyaw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533jEsAk5ZdVMTmE1YTbT7fkQWIMcgYuCmooYXygx6tZKvU2xLKo M+vq96GGWE2uZeASAadKm7mm+vN/eGoDcI0xf48= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyvoO2pw2VSnbVSN1Ed7gAtROTBAk1433lH3abSM0SN9hl7oYq1cfZ0OGgovzbh24m6f97C5qqpgJP+XR0Eh+E= X-Received: by 2002:a02:662b:: with SMTP id k43mr1903647jac.139.1619151522887; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 21:18:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210422040914.47788-1-ilya.lipnitskiy@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Ilya Lipnitskiy Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 21:18:31 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/14] mtk_eth_soc: fixes and performance improvements To: Andrew Lunn Cc: Felix Fietkau , John Crispin , Sean Wang , Mark Lee , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Matthias Brugger , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 5:23 AM Andrew Lunn wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 09:09:00PM -0700, Ilya Lipnitskiy wrote: > > Most of these changes come from OpenWrt where they have been present and > > tested for months. > > > > First three patches are bug fixes. The rest are performance > > improvements. The last patch is a cleanup to use the iopoll.h macro for > > busy-waiting instead of a custom loop. > > Do you have any benchmark numbers you can share? No. Felix, do you have anything handy? If needed, I'll run some tests before and after the patch series on OpenWrt against v5.10, but I only have an MT7621 device - should be better than nothing though... Ilya