From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757537Ab2AKPP6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jan 2012 10:15:58 -0500 Received: from mga05.intel.com ([192.55.52.89]:5103 "EHLO fmsmga101.fm.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757192Ab2AKPP4 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jan 2012 10:15:56 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:15:53 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [GIT] Security subsystem updates for 3.3 From: "Kasatkin, Dmitry" To: Linus Torvalds Cc: James Morris , linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mimi Zohar Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 11:35 PM, James Morris wrote: >>> And "DIGSIG" is really a horrible config name. Did somebody run out of >>> letters suddenly? Is there some global letter shortage that I haven't >>> been told of and that we should do something about? >> >> Any objections to DIGITAL_SIGNATURE_API ? > > Sounds much better. Slightly more typing, but CONFIG_DIGSIG really > didn't tell me anything and sounded like some odd new device to me. > >                          Linus Would just DIGITAL_SIGNATURE be enough? - Dmitry