From: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Daniel Drake <drake@endlessm.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] psi: fix randomized calculation in record_times()
Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2020 10:31:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALOAHbBqk4s4Nw3Ky3YY66EM7DzUJZTuLZhjw9+ULUE-9O+aDQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200403152016.GA69203@cmpxchg.org>
On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 11:20 PM Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 04:55:25AM -0400, Yafang Shao wrote:
> > @@ -690,7 +690,10 @@ static void psi_group_change(struct psi_group *group, int cpu,
> > */
> > write_seqcount_begin(&groupc->seq);
> >
> > - record_times(groupc, cpu, false);
> > + if (groupc->total_tasks)
> > + record_times(groupc, cpu, false);
> > + else
> > + groupc->state_start = cpu_clock(cpu);
>
> This change appears is a no-op. If there are no tasks,
> groupc->state_mask is 0, and the only thing record_times() does is
>
> groupc->state_start = cpu_clock(cpu);
>
> Did you encounter actual problems, or are you just reading the code?
No real issues. Just reading the code and found it looks like a little weird.
But as you explained that state_mask can also guarantee it then we
don't need to make this change.
Thanks for the explanation.
Thanks
Yafang
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-04 2:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-03 8:55 [PATCH] psi: fix randomized calculation in record_times() Yafang Shao
2020-04-03 15:20 ` Johannes Weiner
2020-04-04 2:31 ` Yafang Shao [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CALOAHbBqk4s4Nw3Ky3YY66EM7DzUJZTuLZhjw9+ULUE-9O+aDQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=drake@endlessm.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).