linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: guoqing.jiang@linux.dev, agk@redhat.com, snitzer@kernel.org,
	dm-devel@redhat.com, song@kernel.org, yi.zhang@huawei.com,
	yangerkun@huawei.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH -next v2 2/6] md: refactor action_store() for 'idle' and 'frozen'
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2023 20:25:59 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALTww2-ta1NUJxcT3Dq5KP7iunnVx24X7RKj1OKYTYwEPeDNrg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1aaf9150-bbd3-87a8-8d54-8b5d63ab5ed3@huaweicloud.com>

On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 8:00 PM Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> 在 2023/06/13 16:02, Xiao Ni 写道:
> >
> > 在 2023/5/29 下午9:20, Yu Kuai 写道:
> >> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
> >>
> >> Prepare to handle 'idle' and 'frozen' differently to fix a deadlock,
> >> there
> >> are no functional changes except that MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING is checked
> >> again after 'reconfig_mutex' is held.
> >
> >
> > Can you explain more about why it needs to check MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING
> > again here?
>
> As I explain in the following comment:

Hi

Who can clear the flag before the lock is held?

Regards
Xiao
> >> +    /*
> >> +     * Check again in case MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING is cleared before lock is
> >> +     * held.
> >> +     */
> >> +    if (!test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING, &mddev->recovery)) {
> >> +        mddev_unlock(mddev);
> >> +        return;
> >> +    }
>
> Thanks,
> Kuai
>


  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-13 12:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-29 13:20 [PATCH -next v2 0/6] md: fix that MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING can be cleared while sync_thread is still running Yu Kuai
2023-05-29 13:20 ` [PATCH -next v2 1/6] Revert "md: unlock mddev before reap sync_thread in action_store" Yu Kuai
2023-06-13  6:25   ` Xiao Ni
2023-06-13 11:58     ` Yu Kuai
2023-05-29 13:20 ` [PATCH -next v2 2/6] md: refactor action_store() for 'idle' and 'frozen' Yu Kuai
2023-06-13  8:02   ` [dm-devel] " Xiao Ni
2023-06-13 12:00     ` Yu Kuai
2023-06-13 12:25       ` Xiao Ni [this message]
2023-06-13 12:44         ` Yu Kuai
2023-06-13 14:14           ` Xiao Ni
2023-05-29 13:20 ` [PATCH -next v2 3/6] md: add a mutex to synchronize idle and frozen in action_store() Yu Kuai
2023-06-13 14:43   ` [dm-devel] " Xiao Ni
2023-06-14  1:15     ` Yu Kuai
2023-06-16  6:41       ` Song Liu
2023-05-29 13:20 ` [PATCH -next v2 4/6] md: refactor idle/frozen_sync_thread() to fix deadlock Yu Kuai
2023-06-13 14:50   ` [dm-devel] " Xiao Ni
2023-06-14  1:48     ` Yu Kuai
2023-06-14  2:04       ` Yu Kuai
2023-06-14  7:12         ` Xiao Ni
2023-06-14  7:38           ` Yu Kuai
2023-06-14  7:57             ` Xiao Ni
2023-06-14  8:28               ` Yu Kuai
2023-06-14  9:08                 ` Xiao Ni
2023-06-15  1:28                   ` Yu Kuai
2023-06-15  8:01                     ` Xiao Ni
2023-06-15  8:17                       ` Xiao Ni
2023-06-15  9:05                         ` Yu Kuai
2023-06-15  9:14                           ` Xiao Ni
2023-06-14  3:47       ` Xiao Ni
2023-06-14  6:04         ` Yu Kuai
2023-06-14  6:37           ` Xiao Ni
2023-05-29 13:20 ` [PATCH -next v2 5/6] md: wake up 'resync_wait' at last in md_reap_sync_thread() Yu Kuai
2023-06-14  7:20   ` Xiao Ni
2023-05-29 13:20 ` [PATCH -next v2 6/6] md: enhance checking in md_check_recovery() Yu Kuai
2023-06-14  7:24   ` [dm-devel] " Xiao Ni
2023-06-08  2:41 ` [PATCH -next v2 0/6] md: fix that MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING can be cleared while sync_thread is still running Yu Kuai
2023-06-09  4:44   ` Song Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CALTww2-ta1NUJxcT3Dq5KP7iunnVx24X7RKj1OKYTYwEPeDNrg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=xni@redhat.com \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=guoqing.jiang@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    --cc=yukuai1@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).