linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: rishi gupta <gupt21@gmail.com>
To: Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@microchip.com>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
	Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>,
	UNGLinuxDriver <UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com>,
	Linux I2C <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:HID CORE LAYER" <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: mcp2221: Fix GPIO output handling
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 08:16:14 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALUj-gvDurdVdH3aKeAojay3AR5RL85iHw7Gq13HdFzGrd91DQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201104220223.293253-1-lars.povlsen@microchip.com>

On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 3:32 AM Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@microchip.com> wrote:
>
> The mcp2221 driver GPIO output handling has has several issues.
>
> * A wrong value is used for the GPIO direction.
>
> * Wrong offsets are calculated for some GPIO set value/set direction
>   operations, when offset is larger than 0.
>
> This has been fixed by introducing proper manifest constants for the
> direction encoding, and using 'offsetof' when calculating GPIO
> register offsets.
>
> The updated driver has been tested with the Sparx5 pcb134/pcb135
> board, which has the mcp2221 device with several (output) GPIO's.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@microchip.com>
> ---
>  drivers/hid/hid-mcp2221.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-mcp2221.c b/drivers/hid/hid-mcp2221.c
> index 0d27ccb55dd9..4211b9839209 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-mcp2221.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-mcp2221.c
> @@ -49,6 +49,36 @@ enum {
>         MCP2221_ALT_F_NOT_GPIOD = 0xEF,
>  };
>
> +/* MCP GPIO direction encoding */
> +enum {
> +       MCP2221_DIR_OUT = 0x00,
> +       MCP2221_DIR_IN = 0x01,
> +};
> +
> +#define MCP_NGPIO      4
> +
> +/* MCP GPIO set command layout */
> +struct mcp_set_gpio {
> +       u8 cmd;
> +       u8 dummy;
> +       struct {
> +               u8 change_value;
> +               u8 value;
> +               u8 change_direction;
> +               u8 direction;
> +       } gpio[MCP_NGPIO];
> +} __packed;
> +
> +/* MCP GPIO get command layout */
> +struct mcp_get_gpio {
> +       u8 cmd;
> +       u8 dummy;
> +       struct {
> +               u8 direction;
> +               u8 value;
> +       } gpio[MCP_NGPIO];
> +} __packed;
> +
>  /*
>   * There is no way to distinguish responses. Therefore next command
>   * is sent only after response to previous has been received. Mutex
> @@ -542,7 +572,7 @@ static int mcp_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *gc,
>
>         mcp->txbuf[0] = MCP2221_GPIO_GET;
>
> -       mcp->gp_idx = (offset + 1) * 2;
> +       mcp->gp_idx = offsetof(struct mcp_get_gpio, gpio[offset].value);
>
>         mutex_lock(&mcp->lock);
>         ret = mcp_send_data_req_status(mcp, mcp->txbuf, 1);
> @@ -559,7 +589,7 @@ static void mcp_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *gc,
>         memset(mcp->txbuf, 0, 18);
>         mcp->txbuf[0] = MCP2221_GPIO_SET;
>
> -       mcp->gp_idx = ((offset + 1) * 4) - 1;
> +       mcp->gp_idx = offsetof(struct mcp_set_gpio, gpio[offset].value);
>
>         mcp->txbuf[mcp->gp_idx - 1] = 1;
>         mcp->txbuf[mcp->gp_idx] = !!value;
> @@ -575,7 +605,7 @@ static int mcp_gpio_dir_set(struct mcp2221 *mcp,
>         memset(mcp->txbuf, 0, 18);
>         mcp->txbuf[0] = MCP2221_GPIO_SET;
>
> -       mcp->gp_idx = (offset + 1) * 5;
> +       mcp->gp_idx = offsetof(struct mcp_set_gpio, gpio[offset].direction);
>
>         mcp->txbuf[mcp->gp_idx - 1] = 1;
>         mcp->txbuf[mcp->gp_idx] = val;
> @@ -590,7 +620,7 @@ static int mcp_gpio_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *gc,
>         struct mcp2221 *mcp = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
>
>         mutex_lock(&mcp->lock);
> -       ret = mcp_gpio_dir_set(mcp, offset, 0);
> +       ret = mcp_gpio_dir_set(mcp, offset, MCP2221_DIR_IN);
>         mutex_unlock(&mcp->lock);
>
>         return ret;
> @@ -603,7 +633,7 @@ static int mcp_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *gc,
>         struct mcp2221 *mcp = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
>
>         mutex_lock(&mcp->lock);
> -       ret = mcp_gpio_dir_set(mcp, offset, 1);
> +       ret = mcp_gpio_dir_set(mcp, offset, MCP2221_DIR_OUT);
>         mutex_unlock(&mcp->lock);
>
>         /* Can't configure as output, bailout early */
> @@ -623,7 +653,7 @@ static int mcp_gpio_get_direction(struct gpio_chip *gc,
>
>         mcp->txbuf[0] = MCP2221_GPIO_GET;
>
> -       mcp->gp_idx = (offset + 1) * 2;
> +       mcp->gp_idx = offsetof(struct mcp_get_gpio, gpio[offset].direction);
>
>         mutex_lock(&mcp->lock);
>         ret = mcp_send_data_req_status(mcp, mcp->txbuf, 1);
> @@ -632,7 +662,7 @@ static int mcp_gpio_get_direction(struct gpio_chip *gc,
>         if (ret)
>                 return ret;
>
> -       if (mcp->gpio_dir)
> +       if (mcp->gpio_dir == MCP2221_DIR_IN)
>                 return GPIO_LINE_DIRECTION_IN;
>
>         return GPIO_LINE_DIRECTION_OUT;
> @@ -758,7 +788,7 @@ static int mcp2221_raw_event(struct hid_device *hdev,
>                                 mcp->status = -ENOENT;
>                         } else {
>                                 mcp->status = !!data[mcp->gp_idx];
> -                               mcp->gpio_dir = !!data[mcp->gp_idx + 1];
> +                               mcp->gpio_dir = data[mcp->gp_idx + 1];
>                         }
>                         break;
>                 default:
> @@ -860,7 +890,7 @@ static int mcp2221_probe(struct hid_device *hdev,
>         mcp->gc->get_direction = mcp_gpio_get_direction;
>         mcp->gc->set = mcp_gpio_set;
>         mcp->gc->get = mcp_gpio_get;
> -       mcp->gc->ngpio = 4;
> +       mcp->gc->ngpio = MCP_NGPIO;
>         mcp->gc->base = -1;
>         mcp->gc->can_sleep = 1;
>         mcp->gc->parent = &hdev->dev;
> --
> 2.25.1
>

Reviewed-by: Rishi Gupta <gupt21@gmail.com>

Regards,
Rishi

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-05  2:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-04 22:02 [PATCH] HID: mcp2221: Fix GPIO output handling Lars Povlsen
2020-11-05  2:46 ` rishi gupta [this message]
2020-11-05 10:15 ` Jiri Kosina
2022-11-29 15:39 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-12-13 13:53   ` Sven Zühlsdorf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CALUj-gvDurdVdH3aKeAojay3AR5RL85iHw7Gq13HdFzGrd91DQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=gupt21@gmail.com \
    --cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
    --cc=benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
    --cc=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=lars.povlsen@microchip.com \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).