From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758215Ab3FUCak (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Jun 2013 22:30:40 -0400 Received: from mail-la0-f47.google.com ([209.85.215.47]:53788 "EHLO mail-la0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757878Ab3FUCaj (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Jun 2013 22:30:39 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <51C318D6.4090601@gmail.com> References: <1370589652-24549-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com> <1370589652-24549-5-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com> <51BF2E37.5040400@intel.com> <51C318D6.4090601@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 10:30:37 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [patch v8 4/9] sched: fix slept time double counting in enqueue entity From: Lei Wen To: Alex Shi Cc: Paul Turner , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , Andrew Morton , Borislav Petkov , Namhyung Kim , Mike Galbraith , Morten Rasmussen , Vincent Guittot , Preeti U Murthy , Viresh Kumar , LKML , Mel Gorman , Rik van Riel , Michael Wang , Jason Low , Changlong Xie , sgruszka@redhat.com, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_Weisbecker?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Alex, On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Alex Shi wrote: > On 06/20/2013 10:46 AM, Lei Wen wrote: >> >> >> But here I have a question, there is another usage of __synchronzie_entity_decay >> in current kernel, in the switched_from_fair function. >> >> If task being frequently switched between rt and fair class, would it >> also bring the >> redundant issue? Do we need patch like below? >> >> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c >> index b5408e1..9640c66 100644 >> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c >> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c >> @@ -5856,7 +5856,7 @@ static void switched_from_fair(struct rq *rq, >> struct task_struct *p) >> */ >> if (p->se.avg.decay_count) { >> struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(&p->se); >> - se->avg.last_runnable_update += >> + p->se.avg.last_runnable_update += > > what tree does this patch base on? I create the patch based on v3.9 kernel. If it is ok, I could create a formal one based on latest kernel. Thanks, Lei >> __synchronize_entity_decay(&p->se); >> subtract_blocked_load_contrib(cfs_rq, >> p->se.avg.load_avg_contrib); > > > -- > Thanks > Alex