From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933145AbcLGWgn (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2016 17:36:43 -0500 Received: from mail-ua0-f193.google.com ([209.85.217.193]:36512 "EHLO mail-ua0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932243AbcLGWgm (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2016 17:36:42 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161207224414.GE22478@localhost.localdomain> References: <20161207220348.8572-1-ddstreet@ieee.org> <20161207224414.GE22478@localhost.localdomain> From: Dan Streetman Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 17:36:00 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: bNY82nXVa8wvnAZbzRAk6u66eUw Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: use the correct msix vector for each queue To: Keith Busch Cc: Jens Axboe , linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel , Dan Streetman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Keith Busch wrote: > On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 05:03:48PM -0500, Dan Streetman wrote: >> Change each queue's cq_vector to match its qid, instead of qid - 1. >> >> The first queue is always the admin queue, and the remaining queues are >> I/O queues. The interrupt vectors they use are all in the same array, >> however, the vector indexes for the admin and I/O queues are setup >> differently; the admin queue's cq_vector is manually set to 0, while >> each I/O queue's cq_vector is set to qid - 1. Since the admin queue >> is qid 0, and the I/O queues start at qid 1, using qid - 1 is wrong for the >> I/O queues, as it makes the first I/O queue (qid 1) share the vector from >> the admin queue (qid 0), and no queue uses the last interrupt vector. >> Instead, each I/O queue should set their cq_vector to qid. > > pci_alloc_irq_vectors doesn't know you intend to make the first > vector special, so it's going to come up with a CPU affinity from > blk_mq_pci_map_queues that clashes with what you've programmed in the > IO completion queues. I don't follow. You're saying you mean to share cq_vector 0 between the admin queue and io queue 1?