From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D834C352A3 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 02:08:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0581620842 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 02:08:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1581473327; bh=PrKh7omHj2RciaVbVhAmrjW9Vdd7zZlRNnLqzKtRfew=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:List-ID:From; b=mZHhfOpM77YETnMFASIoIV7puEyFugwzILYznX9lJbnxf628zb7vBiiHfOKZdp0hU N7kpuPZ3fMxXBZd3xdB6ycUtOW5aFS7NHE8ovxs00qVrVVUKHMmBaz4FAJAqZDsFhB vjACqdAQAzZpq7zxaFMXImuXeCxxxWx/+D/TTgfY= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727801AbgBLCIq (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Feb 2020 21:08:46 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:54266 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727761AbgBLCIm (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Feb 2020 21:08:42 -0500 Received: from mail-qk1-f178.google.com (mail-qk1-f178.google.com [209.85.222.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C401120842; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 02:08:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1581473321; bh=PrKh7omHj2RciaVbVhAmrjW9Vdd7zZlRNnLqzKtRfew=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=D4UB4QUpIMywmyY9YqTYSDsy6Tl3vPCB6/pbWBKMGzJQaBrUQVbLSTyq6VtFPMl0P X/JYrLEViCYWWnIjZXVEh5azSRguvlwCEySadHCC7KpNAR0EN24hTx30kAcr95Tktp W8r4xSJqk6VLscMJF72JkITzARQisYUQIyu3OSeI= Received: by mail-qk1-f178.google.com with SMTP id z19so601866qkj.5; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 18:08:41 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWYKA9qdEYaXtTT6xK9fbzWX6Wsi6j/caXXCWQRzkGDnKkjxDKY OGTL9t3odKRJ4Z9oLGL0oFsDneOK+sagpdgu6g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwpb2C+Cwuil3TlZnXwOPTq6EEGKlyg0Jw5Gq9SMUiA0SZqxNJHFPzh0nk1B8fdCrHEGntw42mWREArhwCpbEA= X-Received: by 2002:a37:5347:: with SMTP id h68mr5397468qkb.393.1581473320956; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 18:08:40 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200211142614.13567-1-paul@crapouillou.net> <20200212020707.GA29808@bogus> In-Reply-To: <20200212020707.GA29808@bogus> From: Rob Herring Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 20:08:30 -0600 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] dt-bindings: Document JZ47xx VPU auxiliary processor To: Paul Cercueil Cc: Ohad Ben-Cohen , Bjorn Andersson , Mark Rutland , od@zcrc.me, "open list:REMOTE PROCESSOR (REMOTEPROC) SUBSYSTEM" , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 8:07 PM Rob Herring wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Feb 2020 11:26:09 -0300, Paul Cercueil wrote: > > Inside the Video Processing Unit (VPU) of the recent JZ47xx SoCs from > > Ingenic is a second Xburst MIPS CPU very similar to the main core. > > This document describes the devicetree bindings for this auxiliary > > processor. > > > > Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil > > --- > > > > Notes: > > v2: Update TCSM0 address in example > > v3: Change node name to 'video-decoder' > > v4: Convert to YAML. I didn't add Rob's Ack on v3 because of that (sorry Rob) > > v5: - Fix 'reg' not in pairs > > - Add missing include to devicetree example > > > > .../bindings/remoteproc/ingenic,vpu.yaml | 77 +++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 77 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ingenic,vpu.yaml > > > > Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However, > there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream > maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply. > > If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed. Disregard this, you did say why.