From: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] of: remove extraneous 'const' in typedef
Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 10:13:18 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAL_Jsq+ZRaWbMxDBvZ36qnjECTGpc19oK_ZoEZJ3gkoQSw=VFw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a3YNqUrV1eREJ4eZaULO-+A2EnTg+2s7RUNd77F0d9wng@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 10:03 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 7:24 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>>> One change that was meant to address a sparse warning turned out
>>> to cause hundreds of new gcc-7 warnings:
>>
>> I guess you are the only one on gcc-7.
>
> It was just released last week or so. I actually had been using it for
> a while but accidentally disabled a lot of the warning output until now
> some others started using it too and asked me about it.
>
>>> include/linux/of_irq.h:11:13: error: type qualifiers ignored on function return type [-Werror=ignored-qualifiers]
>>>
>>> After reverting the change, the gcc warnings are gone again, and I
>>> can't reproduce the sparse warnings either.
>>
>> Humm, maybe different sparse versions? I'm on 0.5.0.
>
> I have v0.5.0-183-gfbbfc73. To clarify, I did not get a sparse warning after my
> patch, I did not try reverting your patch first.
Indeed, the warnings are gone with current sparse from git.
Rob
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-11 15:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-11 12:24 [PATCH 1/2] of: remove extraneous 'const' in typedef Arnd Bergmann
2017-05-11 12:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] of: reserved_mem: fix 'const' annotation Arnd Bergmann
2017-05-11 14:50 ` Rob Herring
2017-05-11 15:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-05-11 15:59 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2017-05-11 14:44 ` [PATCH 1/2] of: remove extraneous 'const' in typedef Rob Herring
2017-05-11 15:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-05-11 15:13 ` Rob Herring [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAL_Jsq+ZRaWbMxDBvZ36qnjECTGpc19oK_ZoEZJ3gkoQSw=VFw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).