DT warnings in Cros EC

DT warnings in Cros EC

[Rob Herring]

There's a bunch of warnings in the Cros EC schemas. They stem from
child node names needing to be defined. I started fixing, but it's
kind of a mess as there's a mixture of no unit addresses and different
unit address spaces (regulators and codec). And is type-C and extcon
mutually exclusive? I gave up, so please fix these:

/builds/robherring/linux-dt-bindings/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/extcon/extcon-usbc-cros-ec.example.dt.yaml:
cros-ec@0: 'extcon0', 'extcon1' do not match any of the regexes:
'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-bindings/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/google,cros-ec.yaml
bindings/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/google,cros-ec-pwm.example.dt.yaml:
cros-ec@0: 'ec-pwm' does not match any of the regexes:
'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-bindings/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/google,cros-ec.yaml
/builds/robherring/linux-dt-bindings/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/google,cros-ec-regulator.example.dt.yaml:
ec@0: '#address-cells', '#size-cells', 'regulator@0' do not match any
of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-bindings/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/google,cros-ec.yaml
/builds/robherring/linux-dt-bindings/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/chrome/google,cros-ec-typec.example.dt.yaml:
ec@0: 'typec' does not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-bindings/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/google,cros-ec.yaml
/builds/robherring/linux-dt-bindings/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/google,cros-ec-codec.example.dt.yaml:
cros-ec@0: '#address-cells', '#size-cells', 'ec-codec@10500000' do not
match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-bindings/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/google,cros-ec.yaml


Rob

Re: DT warnings in Cros EC

[Enric Balletbo i Serra]

Hi Rob,

On 28/9/20 18:49, Rob Herring wrote:
> There's a bunch of warnings in the Cros EC schemas. They stem from
> child node names needing to be defined. I started fixing, but it's
> kind of a mess as there's a mixture of no unit addresses and different
> unit address spaces (regulators and codec). And is type-C and extcon
> mutually exclusive? I gave up, so please fix these:
> 
> /builds/robherring/linux-dt-bindings/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/extcon/extcon-usbc-cros-ec.example.dt.yaml:
> cros-ec@0: 'extcon0', 'extcon1' do not match any of the regexes:
> 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
> From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-bindings/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/google,cros-ec.yaml
> bindings/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/google,cros-ec-pwm.example.dt.yaml:
> cros-ec@0: 'ec-pwm' does not match any of the regexes:
> 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
> From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-bindings/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/google,cros-ec.yaml
> /builds/robherring/linux-dt-bindings/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/google,cros-ec-regulator.example.dt.yaml:
> ec@0: '#address-cells', '#size-cells', 'regulator@0' do not match any
> of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
> From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-bindings/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/google,cros-ec.yaml
> /builds/robherring/linux-dt-bindings/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/chrome/google,cros-ec-typec.example.dt.yaml:
> ec@0: 'typec' does not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
> From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-bindings/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/google,cros-ec.yaml
> /builds/robherring/linux-dt-bindings/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/google,cros-ec-codec.example.dt.yaml:
> cros-ec@0: '#address-cells', '#size-cells', 'ec-codec@10500000' do not
> match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
> From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-bindings/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/google,cros-ec.yaml
> 

We will take a look soon and send patches to fix it.

Thanks,
  Enric

> 
> Rob
>