linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: rppt@linux.ibm.com
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
	linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
	arcml <linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org>,
	"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org,
	"moderated list:H8/300 ARCHITECTURE" 
	<uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp>,
	linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org,
	Linux-MIPS <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>,
	nios2-dev@lists.rocketboards.org,
	Openrisc <openrisc@lists.librecores.org>,
	linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	SH-Linux <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	"open list:GENERIC INCLUDE/ASM HEADER FILES" 
	<linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] arm64: Cut rebuild time when changing CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 16:13:10 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqJrMq+QHvuOsqEdCFchmXsd4s2XKUD_TboKzeEQprJvjg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181025172935.GA27364@rapoport-lnx>

On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 12:30 PM Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 08:15:15AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > +Ard
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 4:38 AM Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 02:55:17PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 2:33 PM Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > While investigating why ARM64 required a ton of objects to be rebuilt
> > > > > when toggling CONFIG_DEV_BLK_INITRD, it became clear that this was
> > > > > because we define __early_init_dt_declare_initrd() differently and we do
> > > > > that in arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h which gets included by a fair
> > > > > amount of other header files, and translation units as well.
> > > >
> > > > I scratch my head sometimes as to why some config options rebuild so
> > > > much stuff. One down, ? to go. :)
> > > >
> > > > > Changing the value of CONFIG_DEV_BLK_INITRD is a common thing with build
> > > > > systems that generate two kernels: one with the initramfs and one
> > > > > without. buildroot is one of these build systems, OpenWrt is also
> > > > > another one that does this.
> > > > >
> > > > > This patch series proposes adding an empty initrd.h to satisfy the need
> > > > > for drivers/of/fdt.c to unconditionally include that file, and moves the
> > > > > custom __early_init_dt_declare_initrd() definition away from
> > > > > asm/memory.h
> > > > >
> > > > > This cuts the number of objects rebuilds from 1920 down to 26, so a
> > > > > factor 73 approximately.
> > > > >
> > > > > Apologies for the long CC list, please let me know how you would go
> > > > > about merging that and if another approach would be preferable, e.g:
> > > > > introducing a CONFIG_ARCH_INITRD_BELOW_START_OK Kconfig option or
> > > > > something like that.
> > > >
> > > > There may be a better way as of 4.20 because bootmem is now gone and
> > > > only memblock is used. This should unify what each arch needs to do
> > > > with initrd early. We need the physical address early for memblock
> > > > reserving. Then later on we need the virtual address to access the
> > > > initrd. Perhaps we should just change initrd_start and initrd_end to
> > > > physical addresses (or add 2 new variables would be less invasive and
> > > > allow for different translation than __va()). The sanity checks and
> > > > memblock reserve could also perhaps be moved to a common location.
> > > >
> > > > Alternatively, given arm64 is the only oddball, I'd be fine with an
> > > > "if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64))" condition in the default
> > > > __early_init_dt_declare_initrd as long as we have a path to removing
> > > > it like the above option.
> > >
> > > I think arm64 does not have to redefine __early_init_dt_declare_initrd().
> > > Something like this might be just all we need (completely untested,
> > > probably it won't even compile):
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> > > index 9d9582c..e9ca238 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> > > @@ -62,6 +62,9 @@ s64 memstart_addr __ro_after_init = -1;
> > >  phys_addr_t arm64_dma_phys_limit __ro_after_init;
> > >
> > >  #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD
> > > +
> > > +static phys_addr_t initrd_start_phys, initrd_end_phys;
> > > +
> > >  static int __init early_initrd(char *p)
> > >  {
> > >         unsigned long start, size;
> > > @@ -71,8 +74,8 @@ static int __init early_initrd(char *p)
> > >         if (*endp == ',') {
> > >                 size = memparse(endp + 1, NULL);
> > >
> > > -               initrd_start = start;
> > > -               initrd_end = start + size;
> > > +               initrd_start_phys = start;
> > > +               initrd_end_phys = end;
> > >         }
> > >         return 0;
> > >  }
> > > @@ -407,14 +410,27 @@ void __init arm64_memblock_init(void)
> > >                 memblock_add(__pa_symbol(_text), (u64)(_end - _text));
> > >         }
> > >
> > > -       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD) && initrd_start) {
> > > +       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD) &&
> > > +           (initrd_start || initrd_start_phys)) {
> > > +               /*
> > > +                * FIXME: ensure proper precendence between
> > > +                * early_initrd and DT when both are present
> >
> > Command line takes precedence, so just reverse the order.
> >
> > > +                */
> > > +               if (initrd_start) {
> > > +                       initrd_start_phys = __phys_to_virt(initrd_start);
> > > +                       initrd_end_phys = __phys_to_virt(initrd_end);

BTW, I think you meant virt_to_phys() here?

> >
> > AIUI, the original issue was doing the P2V translation was happening
> > too early and the VA could be wrong if the linear range is adjusted.
> > So I don't think this would work.
>
> Probably things have changed since then, but in the current code there is
>
>                 initrd_start = __phys_to_virt(initrd_start);
>
> and in between only the code related to CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE, so I believe
> it's safe to use __phys_to_virt() here as well.

Here is fine yes, but I believe it was the the phys to virt in the DT
code before adjusting the linear range that was the problem.

Rob

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-25 21:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-24 19:32 [PATCH v2 0/2] arm64: Cut rebuild time when changing CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD Florian Fainelli
2018-10-24 19:32 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] arch: Add asm-generic/initrd.h and make use of it for most architectures Florian Fainelli
2018-10-24 19:32 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: Create asm/initrd.h Florian Fainelli
2018-10-24 19:55 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] arm64: Cut rebuild time when changing CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD Rob Herring
2018-10-24 20:01   ` Florian Fainelli
2018-10-24 21:25     ` Rob Herring
2018-10-25  9:38   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-10-25  9:51     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-10-25 13:15     ` Rob Herring
2018-10-25 17:29       ` Mike Rapoport
2018-10-25 21:13         ` Rob Herring [this message]
2018-10-25 23:07           ` Florian Fainelli
2018-10-26 11:07             ` Mike Rapoport
2018-10-26 19:05               ` Florian Fainelli
2018-10-26  8:12           ` Mike Rapoport

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAL_JsqJrMq+QHvuOsqEdCFchmXsd4s2XKUD_TboKzeEQprJvjg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org \
    --cc=linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-um@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=nios2-dev@lists.rocketboards.org \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    --cc=openrisc@lists.librecores.org \
    --cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).