From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 428D0C433E4 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 22:21:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14552207DF for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 22:21:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1598048514; bh=zT875L3jZJ4vivhMR5xi1PQyDj30T3yhLQ25cxtjVMs=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:List-ID:From; b=kMHcZq0NRVE5hsWHTOC/6CRyptPFiEmybBSSK6Q9ee9GIONy5MQ+QyDbYZ9TveLqg TjwWUYDW9oxGEQBzAL2VWF4ragrMmaCQgUFuofrEAfVMIuFRDKQa/Q5+krRa15cXS9 kauR4iKGvikjkkwrBkXGYQug+sdEh5LXexbXORT8= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727050AbgHUWVx (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Aug 2020 18:21:53 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:43948 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726747AbgHUWVw (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Aug 2020 18:21:52 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-f53.google.com (mail-ot1-f53.google.com [209.85.210.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 55AAA207DF; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 22:21:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1598048511; bh=zT875L3jZJ4vivhMR5xi1PQyDj30T3yhLQ25cxtjVMs=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=cFtjZKA568zBvXXmbolfGuG2z0p8f68ezoXRwKbvTJQpqtRWqI2ugyBgk6qnlR613 yc+rRDN/k15i7g2YBCXbStl3rnSiFDVgghy1uXs+GzhfEv1REEW3BZsJW8CPPFWEuP Y+JFcoyR8aKzhLnWRjpGDB4VmxmGbJ6ZiqSGth5c= Received: by mail-ot1-f53.google.com with SMTP id z18so2791912otk.6; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 15:21:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530/Y8dOkdokmObkTc/gnvKOGJE76P+JvlWq3nEbh1HB8CR5TzyX dYMR0FKIosRVz6grJWIOw2lVJzMTqjYF2tH+ew== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwYCn6kWMxZ3MMVCesxuxOvrTlyCc5cN1Ae197gJkY+XORFl+sBlvUTWsvZv37dHjO+tuVuK1nS28HpCz3gnac= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1d8e:: with SMTP id y14mr3534680oti.129.1598048510539; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 15:21:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1598003509-27896-1-git-send-email-wuht06@gmail.com> <1598003509-27896-3-git-send-email-wuht06@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1598003509-27896-3-git-send-email-wuht06@gmail.com> From: Rob Herring Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 16:21:39 -0600 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: sprd: Add support for Unisoc SoCs' PCIe controller To: Hongtao Wu Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi , Orson Zhai , Baolin Wang , Chunyan Zhang , PCI , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Billows Wu Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 3:52 AM Hongtao Wu wrote: > > From: Billows Wu > > This series adds PCIe controller driver for Unisoc SoCs. > This controller is based on DesignWare PCIe IP. Please test this on top of my 40 part series of DWC clean-ups: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20200821035420.380495-1-robh@kernel.org/ > Signed-off-by: Billows Wu > --- > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig | 12 ++ > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-sprd.c | 256 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 269 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-sprd.c > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig > index 044a376..d26ce94 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig > @@ -311,4 +311,16 @@ config PCIE_AL > required only for DT-based platforms. ACPI platforms with the > Annapurna Labs PCIe controller don't need to enable this. > > +config PCIE_SPRD > + tristate "Unisoc PCIe controller - RC mode" > + depends on ARCH_SPRD || COMPILE_TEST > + depends on PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN > + select PCIE_DW_HOST > + help > + Some Uisoc SoCs contain two PCIe controllers as RC: One is gen2, > + and the other is gen3. While other Unisoc SoCs may have only one > + PCIe controller which can be configured as an Endpoint(EP) or a Root > + complex(RC). In order to enable host-specific features PCIE_SPRD must > + be selected, which uses the Designware core. > + > endmenu > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile > index a751553..eb546e9 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_MESON) += pci-meson.o > obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_TEGRA194) += pcie-tegra194.o > obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_UNIPHIER) += pcie-uniphier.o > obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_UNIPHIER_EP) += pcie-uniphier-ep.o > +obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_SPRD) += pcie-sprd.o > > # The following drivers are for devices that use the generic ACPI > # pci_root.c driver but don't support standard ECAM config access. > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-sprd.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-sprd.c > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..cda812d > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-sprd.c > @@ -0,0 +1,256 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > +/* > + * PCIe host controller driver for Unisoc SoCs > + * > + * Copyright (C) 2020 Unisoc corporation. http://www.unisoc.com > + * > + * Author: Billows Wu > + */ > + > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > + > +#include "pcie-designware.h" > + > +#define NUM_OF_ARGS 5 > + > +struct sprd_pcie { > + struct dw_pcie *pci; > +}; > + > +struct sprd_pcie_of_data { > + enum dw_pcie_device_mode mode; > +}; > + > +static int sprd_pcie_establish_link(struct dw_pcie *pci) > +{ > + return 0; > +} > + > +static const struct dw_pcie_ops sprd_pcie_ops = { > + .start_link = sprd_pcie_establish_link, I don't think you need an empty function here. > +}; > + > +int sprd_pcie_syscon_setting(struct platform_device *pdev, char *env) > +{ > + struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node; > + int i, count, err; > + u32 type, delay, reg, mask, val, tmp_val; > + struct of_phandle_args out_args; > + struct regmap *iomap; > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > + > + if (!of_find_property(np, env, NULL)) { > + dev_info(dev, "There isn't property %s in dts\n", env); > + return 0; > + } > + > + count = of_property_count_elems_of_size(np, env, > + (NUM_OF_ARGS + 1) * sizeof(u32)); > + dev_info(dev, "Property (%s) reg count is %d :\n", env, count); > + > + for (i = 0; i < count; i++) { > + err = of_parse_phandle_with_fixed_args(np, env, NUM_OF_ARGS, > + i, &out_args); > + if (err < 0) > + return err; > + > + type = out_args.args[0]; > + delay = out_args.args[1]; > + reg = out_args.args[2]; > + mask = out_args.args[3]; > + val = out_args.args[4]; > + > + iomap = syscon_node_to_regmap(out_args.np); > + > + switch (type) { > + case 0: > + regmap_update_bits(iomap, reg, mask, val); > + break; > + > + case 1: > + regmap_read(iomap, reg, &tmp_val); > + tmp_val &= (~mask); > + tmp_val |= (val & mask); > + regmap_write(iomap, reg, tmp_val); > + break; > + default: > + break; > + } > + > + if (delay) > + usleep_range(delay, delay + 10); > + > + regmap_read(iomap, reg, &tmp_val); > + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, > + "%2d:reg[0x%8x] mask[0x%8x] val[0x%8x] result[0x%8x]\n", > + i, reg, mask, val, tmp_val); > + } > + > + return i; > +} > + > +static void sprd_pcie_perst_assert(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + sprd_pcie_syscon_setting(pdev, "sprd,pcie-perst-assert"); Not documented. > +} > + > +static void sprd_pcie_perst_deassert(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + sprd_pcie_syscon_setting(pdev, "sprd,pcie-perst-deassert"); These 2 can be a single property. > +} > + > +static int sprd_pcie_host_shutdown(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + int ret; > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > + > + ret = sprd_pcie_syscon_setting(pdev, "sprd,pcie-shutdown-syscons"); Not documented. > + if (ret < 0) > + dev_err(dev, > + "Failed to set pcie shutdown syscons, return %d\n", > + ret); > + > + sprd_pcie_perst_assert(pdev); > + > + ret = pm_runtime_put(&pdev->dev); > + if (ret < 0) > + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, > + "Failed to put runtime,return %d\n", ret); > + > + return ret; > +} > + > +static int sprd_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp) > +{ > + struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp); > + struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(pci->dev); > + > + sprd_pcie_perst_deassert(pdev); > + > + dw_pcie_setup_rc(pp); > + > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_MSI)) You won't need this check anymore with my series. > + dw_pcie_msi_init(pp); > + > + if (dw_pcie_wait_for_link(pci)) { > + dev_warn(pci->dev, > + "pcie ep may has not been powered on yet\n"); > + sprd_pcie_host_shutdown(pdev); > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static const struct dw_pcie_host_ops sprd_pcie_host_ops = { > + .host_init = sprd_pcie_host_init, > +}; > + > +static int sprd_add_pcie_port(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + struct resource *res; > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > + struct sprd_pcie *ctrl = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > + struct dw_pcie *pci = ctrl->pci; > + struct pcie_port *pp = &pci->pp; > + > + res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "dbi"); The core will do this for you. > + if (!res) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + pci->dbi_base = devm_ioremap(dev, res->start, resource_size(res)); > + if (!pci->dbi_base) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + pp->ops = &sprd_pcie_host_ops; > + > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_MSI)) { > + pp->msi_irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "msi"); > + if (pp->msi_irq < 0) { > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to get msi, return %d\n", > + pp->msi_irq); > + return pp->msi_irq; > + } > + } > + > + return dw_pcie_host_init(pp); > +} > + > +static int sprd_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > + struct dw_pcie *pci; > + struct sprd_pcie *ctrl; > + int ret; > + > + ctrl = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*ctrl), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!ctrl) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + pci = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pci), GFP_KERNEL); Embed dw_pcie in sprd_pcie and then have a single alloc. > + if (!pci) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + pci->dev = dev; > + pci->ops = &sprd_pcie_ops; > + ctrl->pci = pci; > + > + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, ctrl); > + > + pm_runtime_enable(dev); > + ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev); I don't think these do anything because you don't have any suspend/resume callbacks. > + if (ret < 0) { > + dev_err(dev, "Fialed to get runtime sync, return %d\n", ret); > + goto err_get_sync; > + } > + > + ret = sprd_pcie_syscon_setting(pdev, "sprd,pcie-startup-syscons"); I don't like all these properties. Do they point to different blocks? If all the same block, then 1 property please. Maybe you need a reset controller? > + if (ret < 0) { > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to get pcie syscons, return %d\n", ret); > + goto err_power_off; > + } > + > + ret = sprd_add_pcie_port(pdev); > + if (ret) > + dev_warn(dev, "Failed to initialize RC controller\n"); > + > + return 0; > + > +err_power_off: > + sprd_pcie_syscon_setting(pdev, "sprd,pcie-shutdown-syscons"); > + > +err_get_sync: > + pm_runtime_put(&pdev->dev); > + pm_runtime_disable(dev); > + > + return ret; > +} > + > +static const struct of_device_id sprd_pcie_of_match[] = { > + { > + .compatible = "sprd,pcie", > + }, > + {}, > +}; > + > +static struct platform_driver sprd_pcie_driver = { > + .probe = sprd_pcie_probe, > + .driver = { > + .name = "sprd-pcie", > + .of_match_table = sprd_pcie_of_match, > + }, > +}; > + > +module_platform_driver(sprd_pcie_driver); > + > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Unisoc PCIe host controller driver"); > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); > -- > 2.7.4 >