From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755113AbbJ1AqX (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Oct 2015 20:46:23 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:49392 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755072AbbJ1AqT (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Oct 2015 20:46:19 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20151027225000.GA64073@google.com> References: <20151011200402.GE3696@localhost> <20151027225000.GA64073@google.com> From: Rob Herring Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 19:45:57 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] mtd: ofpart: update devicetree binding specification To: Brian Norris Cc: Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , David Woodhouse , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , Boris Brezillon , Michal Suchanek Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Brian Norris wrote: > Hi Rob, > > Thanks for the review. > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:35:24PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Brian Norris >> wrote: >> > Hi DT maintainers, >> > >> > It's a bit hypocritical of me, since I've been a slow reviewer as well, >> > but... can we get some review on this one? Usually, I'm comfortable >> > taking driver DT bindings without your review, but this one is a bit >> > more generic and is more far-reaching than the average driver. >> >> Sorry, missed this one. This would be a good one to send to >> devicetree-spec to BTW. > > I'm not very familiar with that list. With the intention of getting into > an ePAPR (or similar) spec? Or just for additional review? If the > former, would you suggest codifying both the old and the new, or just > the new? I would say it is for anything not driver specific. It was created to separate out the driver binding firehose from the common bindings and get more non-Linux participation on those. Perhaps it was poorly named. I want to improve the split in docs so the appropriate list is used. Sending to both devicetree and devicetree-spec is fine. Rob