From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.2 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 994A9C282C3 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 13:40:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6937720870 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 13:40:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1548164443; bh=esbp9yipemWFMphPhojg5duibYbaUh0JWxIadTVP0vY=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:List-ID:From; b=0Dq5Ar9n6GdQhPul2r1UMpT497wcP0KkG3Ct9pwb6WANh4pqH0pg1UGJJWheh0E4/ 8IP7NzEPVfvAic2GDtxN7xi1eZBX4xYVecC02VEkpUSNEe/5WE3i89BTO4aUTnjvmp vHooQRB0Asy6R4ETHAU61B+ehT8cAPYhNp8jDJ1c= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728622AbfAVNkl (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jan 2019 08:40:41 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:33278 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728416AbfAVNkl (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jan 2019 08:40:41 -0500 Received: from mail-qt1-f181.google.com (mail-qt1-f181.google.com [209.85.160.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1A89920870; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 13:40:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1548164440; bh=esbp9yipemWFMphPhojg5duibYbaUh0JWxIadTVP0vY=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=NPH9i+oUre4ZzBzURZisLcgijhVu68l0fyNbD1HBoOYXzIBIM2F8oi+ISdjS3rZcO 6kNGyXcHK7ABrzq6aKJxQrBU3B1MsVYRyWgN+9WM02/EavoUThA3n7Uhcw0eC3uOCD 7FIeWBPZzEaDam+sNvgHhyMenn0uW6ompduZsIb0= Received: by mail-qt1-f181.google.com with SMTP id d19so27513354qtq.9; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 05:40:40 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukfoeiFn27tegQjGaLd69qBeb/+l8YRpriMAL899LnmbzSynP0FY 0zprlP+mWgNP2leS07dPtlw+UmQivktfEH+XNw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN6VWQGgEZg/m39bTZGl5i9AbykXudTG4rdsmuBKNFX7AihzzCAkCGIaaG+cZcAC9tqIVmkzewOr+lMujKnbjoI= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:2d2b:: with SMTP id n40mr30157262qta.38.1548164439355; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 05:40:39 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190122010733.GA21139@bogus> <24a53365-1a8c-51cd-dcd4-db4a69d5256a@microchip.com> In-Reply-To: <24a53365-1a8c-51cd-dcd4-db4a69d5256a@microchip.com> From: Rob Herring Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 07:40:26 -0600 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] dt-bindings: arm: atmel: add new sam9x60 reset controller binding To: Nicolas Ferre Cc: Alexandre Belloni , Ludovic Desroches , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" , Sebastian Reichel , "open list:THERMAL" , netdev , David Miller , Linux USB List , Alan Stern , Greg Kroah-Hartman , devicetree@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 3:00 AM wrote: > > Hi Rob, > > On 22/01/2019 at 02:07, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 10:57:38AM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > >> Update the Reset Controller's binding to add new SoC compatibility string. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre > >> --- > >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-sysregs.txt | 1 + > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-sysregs.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-sysregs.txt > >> index 36952cc39993..badce6ef3ab3 100644 > >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-sysregs.txt > >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-sysregs.txt > >> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ Its subnodes can be: > >> RSTC Reset Controller required properties: > >> - compatible: Should be "atmel,-rstc". > >> can be "at91sam9260", "at91sam9g45", "sama5d3" or "samx7" > >> + it also can be "microchip,sam9x60-rstc" > > > > How is this related to at91sam9260-rstc? > > at91sam9260 and sam9x60 are completely different products (they share > the same core though...). I know the naming could be misleading but it > is like it is... > > > The 'x' is a wildcard? We generally avoid wildcards. > > Here, the 'x' is definitively not a wildcard nor a kind of "family" > name, it's included in the (upcoming) single product's name. > > I hope it clarifies. Yes, thanks. Reviewed-by: Rob Herring