From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756118AbdAHLd5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jan 2017 06:33:57 -0500 Received: from mail-lf0-f66.google.com ([209.85.215.66]:35778 "EHLO mail-lf0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756065AbdAHLdp (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jan 2017 06:33:45 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170108112542.GC12798@kroah.com> References: <1482259992-16680-1-git-send-email-4sschmid@informatik.uni-hamburg.de> <1483808145-18417-1-git-send-email-4sschmid@informatik.uni-hamburg.de> <1483808145-18417-2-git-send-email-4sschmid@informatik.uni-hamburg.de> <20170108112542.GC12798@kroah.com> From: Rui Salvaterra Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 11:33:42 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] lib: Update LZ4 compressor module based on LZ4 v1.7.2. To: Greg KH Cc: Sven Schmidt <4sschmid@informatik.uni-hamburg.de>, akpm@linux-foundation.org, bongkyu.kim@lge.com, sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, davem@davemloft.net, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, anton@enomsg.org, ccross@android.com, keescook@chromium.org, tony.luck@intel.com, phillip@squashfs.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 8 January 2017 at 11:25, Greg KH wrote: > On Sat, Jan 07, 2017 at 05:55:42PM +0100, Sven Schmidt wrote: >> This patch updates LZ4 kernel module to LZ4 v1.7.2 by Yann Collet. >> The kernel module is inspired by the previous work by Chanho Min. >> The updated LZ4 module will not break existing code since there were alias >> methods added to ensure backwards compatibility. > > Meta-comment. Does this update include all of the security fixes that > we have made over the past few years to the lz4 code? I don't want to > be adding back insecure functions that will cause us problems. > > Specifically look at the changes I made in 2014 in this directory for an > example of what I am talking about here. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Also, this series must be tested on big endian, to make sure the last fixes we made don't regress. Thanks, Rui