linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
To: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>, Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
	Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name>,
	Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>,
	Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>,
	Masayoshi Mizuma <msys.mizuma@gmail.com>,
	Xing Zhengjun <zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] mm/memcg: Optimize user context object stock access
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 16:14:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALvZod4CUMOBOkC8NjXXJ_qu3kvhcw+zrux+c516BMcAuHTcuA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALvZod6_dOKfnhprpzoFNmC2cLu1F35dNZvnu-DHTNOxYmeq2g@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 4:10 PM Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 3:55 PM Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Most kmem_cache_alloc() calls are from user context. With instrumentation
> > enabled, the measured amount of kmem_cache_alloc() calls from non-task
> > context was about 0.01% of the total.
> >
> > The irq disable/enable sequence used in this case to access content
> > from object stock is slow.  To optimize for user context access, there
> > are now two object stocks for task context and interrupt context access
> > respectively.
> >
> > The task context object stock can be accessed after disabling preemption
> > which is cheap in non-preempt kernel. The interrupt context object stock
> > can only be accessed after disabling interrupt. User context code can
> > access interrupt object stock, but not vice versa.
> >
> > The mod_objcg_state() function is also modified to make sure that memcg
> > and lruvec stat updates are done with interrupted disabled.
> >
> > The downside of this change is that there are more data stored in local
> > object stocks and not reflected in the charge counter and the vmstat
> > arrays.  However, this is a small price to pay for better performance.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
> > Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
> > ---
> >  mm/memcontrol.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> >  1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > index 69f728383efe..29f2df76644a 100644
> > --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> > +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > @@ -2229,7 +2229,8 @@ struct obj_stock {
> >  struct memcg_stock_pcp {
> >         struct mem_cgroup *cached; /* this never be root cgroup */
> >         unsigned int nr_pages;
> > -       struct obj_stock obj;
> > +       struct obj_stock task_obj;
> > +       struct obj_stock irq_obj;
> >
> >         struct work_struct work;
> >         unsigned long flags;
> > @@ -2254,11 +2255,48 @@ static bool obj_stock_flush_required(struct memcg_stock_pcp *stock,
> >  }
> >  #endif
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Most kmem_cache_alloc() calls are from user context. The irq disable/enable
> > + * sequence used in this case to access content from object stock is slow.
> > + * To optimize for user context access, there are now two object stocks for
> > + * task context and interrupt context access respectively.
> > + *
> > + * The task context object stock can be accessed by disabling preemption only
> > + * which is cheap in non-preempt kernel. The interrupt context object stock
> > + * can only be accessed after disabling interrupt. User context code can
> > + * access interrupt object stock, but not vice versa.
> > + */
> >  static inline struct obj_stock *current_obj_stock(void)
> >  {
> >         struct memcg_stock_pcp *stock = this_cpu_ptr(&memcg_stock);
> >
> > -       return &stock->obj;
> > +       return in_task() ? &stock->task_obj : &stock->irq_obj;
> > +}
> > +
> > +#define get_obj_stock(flags)                           \
> > +({                                                     \
> > +       struct memcg_stock_pcp *stock;                  \
> > +       struct obj_stock *obj_stock;                    \
> > +                                                       \
> > +       if (in_task()) {                                \
> > +               preempt_disable();                      \
> > +               (flags) = -1L;                          \
> > +               stock = this_cpu_ptr(&memcg_stock);     \
>
> The above line was missing in the previous version.
>
> > +               obj_stock = &stock->task_obj;           \
> > +       } else {                                        \
> > +               local_irq_save(flags);                  \
> > +               stock = this_cpu_ptr(&memcg_stock);     \
> > +               obj_stock = &stock->irq_obj;            \
> > +       }                                               \
> > +       obj_stock;                                      \
> > +})
> > +
> > +static inline void put_obj_stock(unsigned long flags)
> > +{
> > +       if (flags == -1L)
> > +               preempt_enable();
> > +       else
> > +               local_irq_restore(flags);
> >  }
> >
> >  /**
> > @@ -2327,7 +2365,9 @@ static void drain_local_stock(struct work_struct *dummy)
> >         local_irq_save(flags);
> >
> >         stock = this_cpu_ptr(&memcg_stock);
> > -       drain_obj_stock(&stock->obj);
> > +       drain_obj_stock(&stock->irq_obj);
> > +       if (in_task())
> > +               drain_obj_stock(&stock->task_obj);
> >         drain_stock(stock);
> >         clear_bit(FLUSHING_CACHED_CHARGE, &stock->flags);
> >
> > @@ -3183,7 +3223,7 @@ static inline void mod_objcg_state(struct obj_cgroup *objcg,
> >         memcg = obj_cgroup_memcg(objcg);
> >         if (pgdat)
> >                 lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(memcg, pgdat);
> > -       __mod_memcg_lruvec_state(memcg, lruvec, idx, nr);
> > +       mod_memcg_lruvec_state(memcg, lruvec, idx, nr);
> >         rcu_read_unlock();
> >  }
> >
> > @@ -3193,7 +3233,7 @@ static bool consume_obj_stock(struct obj_cgroup *objcg, unsigned int nr_bytes)
> >         unsigned long flags;
> >         bool ret = false;
> >
> > -       local_irq_save(flags);
> > +       stock = get_obj_stock(flags);
> >
> >         stock = current_obj_stock();
>
> The above is redundant.
>

After cleanup you can add:

Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-12 23:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-12 22:54 [PATCH v2 0/5] mm/memcg: Reduce kmemcache memory accounting overhead Waiman Long
2021-04-12 22:54 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] mm/memcg: Pass both memcg and lruvec to mod_memcg_lruvec_state() Waiman Long
2021-04-12 22:55 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] mm/memcg: Introduce obj_cgroup_uncharge_mod_state() Waiman Long
2021-04-12 22:55 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] mm/memcg: Cache vmstat data in percpu memcg_stock_pcp Waiman Long
2021-04-12 23:03   ` Shakeel Butt
2021-04-12 22:55 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] mm/memcg: Separate out object stock data into its own struct Waiman Long
2021-04-12 23:07   ` Shakeel Butt
2021-04-12 22:55 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] mm/memcg: Optimize user context object stock access Waiman Long
2021-04-12 23:10   ` Shakeel Butt
2021-04-12 23:14     ` Shakeel Butt [this message]
2021-04-13  1:03     ` Waiman Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CALvZod4CUMOBOkC8NjXXJ_qu3kvhcw+zrux+c516BMcAuHTcuA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=chris@chrisdown.name \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=msys.mizuma@gmail.com \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
    --cc=zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).