From: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Alexey Avramov <hakavlad@inbox.lv>,
Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Darrick Wong <djwong@kernel.org>,
regressions@lists.linux.dev,
Linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] mm: vmscan: Reduce throttling due to a failure to make progress
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2021 22:06:27 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALvZod5BmFVdosG=e2NcEzeuzv0W9WifSBmeD48xnn1k+SNRKg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211203190807.GE3366@techsingularity.net>
On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 11:08 AM Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> wrote:
>
[...]
> > I am in agreement with the motivation of the whole series. I am just
> > making sure that the motivation of VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS based
> > throttle is more than just the congestion_wait of
> > mem_cgroup_force_empty_write.
> >
>
> The commit that primarily targets congestion_wait is 8cd7c588decf
> ("mm/vmscan: throttle reclaim until some writeback completes if
> congested"). The series recognises that there are other reasons why
> reclaim can fail to make progress that is not directly writeback related.
>
I agree with throttling for VMSCAN_THROTTLE_[WRITEBACK|ISOLATED]
reasons. Please explain why we should throttle for
VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS? Also 69392a403f49 claims "Direct reclaim
primarily is throttled in the page allocator if it is failing to make
progress.", can you please explain how?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-06 6:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-02 15:06 Mel Gorman
2021-12-02 16:30 ` Shakeel Butt
2021-12-02 16:52 ` Mel Gorman
2021-12-02 17:41 ` Shakeel Butt
2021-12-03 9:01 ` Mel Gorman
2021-12-03 17:50 ` Shakeel Butt
2021-12-03 19:08 ` Mel Gorman
2021-12-06 6:06 ` Shakeel Butt [this message]
2021-12-06 11:25 ` Mel Gorman
2021-12-07 7:14 ` Shakeel Butt
2021-12-07 9:28 ` Mel Gorman
2021-12-09 6:20 ` Hugh Dickins
2021-12-09 9:53 ` Mel Gorman
2021-12-28 10:04 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2021-12-29 23:45 ` Andrew Morton
2021-12-31 14:24 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2021-12-31 18:33 ` Hugh Dickins
2021-12-31 19:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-12-31 19:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-12-31 19:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-01-01 10:52 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2021-12-31 21:04 ` Andrew Morton
2021-12-31 21:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 21:10 ` Shuang Zhai
2022-02-15 14:49 ` Mel Gorman
2022-02-22 17:27 ` [PATCH v4 1/1] mm: vmscan: Reduce throttling due to a failure to make progress' Shuang Zhai
2022-02-23 12:50 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CALvZod5BmFVdosG=e2NcEzeuzv0W9WifSBmeD48xnn1k+SNRKg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=hakavlad@inbox.lv \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--subject='Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] mm: vmscan: Reduce throttling due to a failure to make progress' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).